Chandigarh

StateCommission

CC/247/2015

Smt. Amarjit Sandhu - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd & anr. - Opp.Party(s)

Pavinder Singh Bedi & Gaurav Bhardwaj

12 Apr 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH
 

Consumer Complaint	:	247 of 2015
Date of Institution	:	19.10.2015
Date of Decision	:	12.04.2016

 

Smt. Amarjit Sandhu w/o Sh. G. S. Sandhu, R/o House No.213-L, Sector 4, M.D.C., Panchkula.

……Complainant.

Versus

1. M/s Puma Realtors Pvt. Ltd., Office at S.C.O No.6-8, Sector 9, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh through its Director.

….Opposite Party.

 

2. Mr. Raj Kumar Verma S/o Sh. Pyare Lal Verma, R/o House No.325, Ward No.17, Tohana, District Fatehbad, Haryana.

….Performa Opposite Party.

Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE: JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT.

                 SH. DEV RAJ, MEMBER.

                 MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER.

               

Argued by:

 

Sh.  Parvinder Singh Bedi,  Advocate  for  the complainant.

Sh. Ramnik Gupta, Advocate for Opposite Party No.1.

Service of Opposite Party No.2 dispensed with vide order dated 17.11.2015.

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

            Vide our detailed order of the even date, recorded separately in Consumer Complaint No.246 of 2015 titled as ‘Mr. Vinod Kumar & Anr. Vs. M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited & Another’, this complaint has been partly accepted, with costs against Opposite Party No.1 only. However, the same (complaint) has been dismissed against Opposite Party No.2.

2.            Certified copy of the main order, passed in Consumer Complaint No.246 of 2015 titled as ‘Mr. Vinod Kumar & Anr. Vs. M/s Puma Realtors Private Limited & Another’, be placed on this file also.

3.           Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge.

Pronounced

April  12, 2016.

 

[JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

[DEV RAJ]

MEMBER

 

 

 

[PADMA PANDEY]

 MEMBER