DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

THIRUVALLUR -1

PRESENT: THIRU.S.PANDIAN.B.Sc., L.L.M.,                                     - PRESIDENT

THIRU:BASKARKUMARAVEL .B.Sc.,L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP.,          - MEMBER

Consumer Complaint No.05/2006

Dated this Monday the 07^th day of May 2018

T.G. Shanmugam,

No.24, Mettu street,

Pungathur Village,

Thiruvallur Taulk, Thiruvallur Dt.,                                                   ………  Complainant.

                                       //Verses//

The  Director,

Prammaputhra Plantations Private Limited,

 Registered Office No 21/A 425 Market Road,

Near Aurveda Collage,

Tripunithra – Cochin,

Kerala -682 301.                                                                                 ……Opposite Party.

Counsel for Complainant:                                                    Mr. V.Murali , Advocate

ORDERS

PRONONUCED BY THIRU.S.PANDIAN, PRESIDENT

1.This complainant is filed by the complainant U/S of Consumer protection Act,1986 against the opposite party for seeking Rs.1,00,000/- towards the compensation for the failure in service Rs.25,000/- with costRs.5,000/-.  Hence this complainant.

No representation on the side of the complainant for the past 11 years.  At this Juncture, it is carefully perused the adjudication, it is learnt that on 30.03.2007, it is endorsed that the Hon’ble Kerala High Court seized of the matter on representation by the advocate.

It is further noticed that in spite of intimation to furnish the order copy of the Hon’ble High Court, either the complainant or the counsel for the complaint have not come forward to produce the same till 29.06.2016.  So, this Forum suomotto issued notice to the both parties and on that notice, the complainant had only appeared on 26.07.2016 and prays further time to proceed further.  Thereafter he has not appeared and the counsel for the complainant also not represented before this forum.

In such circumstances, since this complaint is pending for more than 11 years without any information and no steps furnished by the complainant. In spite of more than sufficient time given, there is no valid reason to prolong this matter further. Moreover, there is no Justification to adjourn this case without any further progress, accordingly   for more than 11 years.

Hence, this complainant is dismissed for default.  No Cost.

This order was dictated by the Member to the steno-typist, typed by her, corrected, sighed and pronounced by us in open Forum, today on this day of 7^th May 2018

   -Sd-                                                                                                                  -Sd-

MEMBER                                                                                                    PRESIDENT