Delhi

North West

CC/711/2015

MUKESH KUMAR BANSAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S PRABHU SHANTI REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD. & ANR - Opp.Party(s)

21 Mar 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION-V, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/711/2015
( Date of Filing : 13 Jul 2015 )
 
1. MUKESH KUMAR BANSAL
6/507,TEACHER COLONY ,GALI,NEAR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,RAILAWAY ROAD ,BAHADURGARH,HARYANA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S PRABHU SHANTI REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD. & ANR
SH.BIJENDER SINGH,THROUGH DIRECTOR, BU-I,SFS FLATS,PRITAMPURA,NEW DELHI-110088 ALSO AT: 1214,SEC-6,BAHADURGARH-124507,HARYANA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  NIPUR CHANDNA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Mar 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Ms. NIPUR CHANDNA, MEMBER

 

ORDER        

                                                    21.03.2024

 

  1. The complainant has filed the present complaint alleging the deficiency in service on the part of the OP.
  2. During the course of the arguments complainant counsel admit that the cost of the flat in question is Rs. 48,05,000/-.
  3. We have heard Ld. Counsel for complainant Sh. Aman Jawala on the issue of pecuniary jurisdiction  and have perused the record.
  4. Perusal of the record shows that the complainant had purchased the flat in question for a sum of Rs. 48,05,000/-.The complainant has prayed for refund of sum of Rs. 12,13,600/- along with interest. He also further prayed for compensation and litigation to the tune of Rs. 2,11,000/-.
  5. Admittedly, in the present complaint case the cost of the flat in question is  Rs. 48,05,000/- and the complainant has prayed for refund of the sum of Rs. 12,13,600/- along with interest and compensation which goes beyond the Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Forum i.e. Rs. 20 lacs. In the light of judgment of Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Case no. 97 of 2016, decided by Hon’ble NCDRC on 07/10/2016 reported as Manu/CF/0499/16 the present complaint case is not maintainable before this Commission due to lack of pecuniary jurisdiction as the cost of the flat/plot and relief claimed exceeds the Pecuniary Jurisdiction of this Forum. 
  6. Accordingly, the complaint be returned to the complainant along with annexures/ documents by retaining a copy of the same for records with liberty to file the complaint before the competent Forum as per the Law. The particulars in the light of the judgment of Hon’ble NCDRC in the matter of Tushar Batra & Anr. Vs. M/S Unitech Limited decided on 26/04/2017, Case no.-299 of 2014 are as follows.

Date of presentation of complaint :-    13.07.2015

Date of return of complaint :-21.03.2024

Name of complainant :-Mr. Mukesh Kumar Bansal

 

  1. Copy of the order be given to the parties free of cost as per order dated 04.04.2022 of Hon’ble State Commission after receiving the application from the parties in the registry. Order be uploaded on www.confonet.nic.in.

 

Announced  in open Forum on 21.03.2024.

 

 

Sanjay Kumar                       Nipur Chandna                               Rajesh       

President                                     Member                                       Member

 

 

 
 
[ NIPUR CHANDNA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.