This is a complaint filed by the complainant for granting compensation of Rs.3,000/-. <br /> Notice was issued to opposite party. Notice was served. In spite of service of notice, the opposite party has not appeared and contested the matter and therefore, opposite party was placed exparte. <br /> The complainant filed affidavit evidence. Heard the arguments of complainant in person. <br /> Point for consideration is:-<br /> Whether the complaint is maintainable?<br /> REASONS<br /> I have gone through the complainant allegations. The complainant has stated in his complaint that he has purchased a set, but he has not specified what the set is. There is no description over the set. We cannot make out by reading the complaint. He has not produced any receipt for having purchase the set. As per the submission of complainant he has given the C.D Player set to the opposite party for repairs. The Xerox copy of the service slip is produced. On this document the complainant has given the player to the opposite party for service on 31/8/2005. The complainant has not produced the original service slip. According to the complainant the set was given for repairs on 31/8/2005 and he has filed the complaint on 16/11/2007. Therefore, the complaint lodged by him is beyond period of two years. The complainant has not given any reasons for making so in-order delay in filing complaint. The complaint is time barred. Therefore, the same is not maintainable. The complaint filed by the complainant deserves to be dismissed. In the result, I proceed to pass the following:-<br /> ORDER<br /> The complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.<br /> Order accordingly,<br /> <br /> PRESIDENT<br /> We concur the above findings.<br /> MEMBER MEMBER<br /> <br /> <br />