Delhi

New Delhi

CC/193/2016

Vinod Kumar Bansal - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd & Ors - Opp.Party(s)

07 Jun 2018

ORDER

 

Case No.CC-   193/2016                                                                                                             Dated:   07/06/2018        

 

The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the cost of the flat/plot and relief claimed exceeds Rs. 20 Lacs  , as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, in the light of  Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Case no. 97 of 2016, decided by Hon’ble NCDRC on 07/10/2016 reported as Manu/CF/0499/16. Perusal of file shows that the  reliefs claimed the  pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum, i.e. Rs. 20 Lacs.

In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that this Forum does not have the Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain the present complaint. Accordingly, the complaint be returned to the complainant along with annexures/ documents by retaining a copy of the same for records with liberty to file the same before the competent Forum as per the Law. The particulars in the light of the judgement of Hon’ble NCDRC in the matter of Tushar Batra & Anr. Vs. M/S Unitech Limited decided on 26/04/2017, Case no.-299 of 2014 are as follows.

•  Date of presentation of complaint :-17/03/2016.

 

• Date of return of complaint :-           07/06/2018

 

• Name of complainant :                  VINOD KUMAR BANSAL.

Copy of the order be given Dasti to the parties.

 

Announced  in open Forum on 07/06/2018 .

File be consigned to record room.

 

 

 

 (ARUN KUMAR ARYA)

                             PRESIDENT

       (NIPUR CHANDNA)                                                   (H M VYAS)

                           MEMBER                                                                 MEMBER