Delhi

New Delhi

CC/535/2015

Mrs Rekha Bansal - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Parsvnath Developers Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

22 Nov 2018

ORDER

 

 

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI

(DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1^STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,

I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.

 

Case No.CC.535/2015                                Dated:

In the matter of:

 

Rekha Bansal

…Complainant

 

Versus

 

M/s Parsvnath Developers Pvt. Ltd.

… Opposite Party

 

ARUN KUMAR ARYA, PRESIDENT

O R D E R

 

The OP has moved an application for dismissal of complaint on the ground of Pecuniary Jurisdiction, stating that the total cost of the unit is Rs.21,00,000/- which exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum i.e. Rs. 20 Lacs, as such, this Forum does not have Pecuniary Jurisdiction to entertain this complaint, in the light of  Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Case no. 97 of 2016, decided by Hon’ble NCDRC on 07/10/2016 reported as Manu/CF/0499/16. During the course of arguments, it is admitted that the cost of unit in question and reliefs claim exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum, i.e. Rs. 20 Lacs.

It is further stated by the counsel for the complainant that although the cost of unit in question and reliefs claim exceeds the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum, i.e. Rs. 20 Lacs but the judgment of Ambrish Kumar Shukla and Ors. Vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Case no. 97 of 2016, decided by Hon’ble NCDRC on 07/10/2016 reported as Manu/CF/0499/16 is not applicable in his case, as he don’t want to go ahead with the property in question and only wants the refund of the money deposited with the OP.  In support of his contention, he relied upon the judgment of Hon’ble National Commission, author by Sh. Prem Narain, titled as Pradeep Kumar Batra Vs. M/s Three C Shelter Pvt. Ltd. decided on 20.2.2018.

In the present case, the complainant has relied upon the judgement cited above, the said judgement is of single member of the National Commission and the same is “per incuriam” against the ratio of the Ambrish Kumar Shukla’s judgment, as held by the  Hon’ble National Commission in 1^st Appeal No.2080 of 2017 titled as Vikul Kumar Gupta Vs. M/s Ramprastha Promoters and Developers decided on 20.2.2018

In view of the above discussion, we  are of the considered opinion  that the judgments relied upon by the complainant is not applicable in the present case. The cost of the flat/plot and relief claimed exceeds the Pecuniary Jurisdiction of this Forum.  Accordingly, the application filed by the OP is allowed and the complaint be returned to the complainant along with annexures/ documents by retaining a copy of the same for records with liberty to file the same before the competent Forum as per the Law. The particulars in the light of the judgement of Hon’ble NCDRC in the matter of Tushar Batra & Anr. Vs. M/S Unitech Limited decided on 26/04/2017, Case no.-299 of 2014 are as follows.

• Date of presentation of complaint :-    13/08/2015.

 

• Date of return of complaint :-                22/11/2018.

 

• Name of complainant :-                          REKHA BANSAL

Copy of the order be given Dasti to the parties.  File be consigned to record room.

 

Announced  in open Forum on  22/11/2018. .

 

 

 (ARUN KUMAR ARYA)

                             PRESIDENT

      (NIPUR CHANDNA)                                                 (H M VYAS)

                          MEMBER                                                          MEMBER