View 1147 Cases Against Parsvnath
View 981 Cases Against Parsvnath Developers
Surinder Singh Rana filed a consumer case on 12 Oct 2017 against M/s Parsvnath Developers Limited in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is EA/10/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 14 Nov 2017.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Execution Application No. 10 of 2017
In Complaint No. 179 of 2015
Date of the Institution: 27.04.2017
Date of Decision: 12.10.2017
1. Surinder Singh Rana son of Shri Shamsher Singh,
2. Smt. Rakesh Rana wife of Shri Surinder Singh Rana,
Both residents of C/o Shri J.S. Thakur, Flat No.411, GH-33, Sector-20, Panchkula and of # 14, Penrth Cres London ONT N6G 4 MB Canada.
Decree Holders-Complainants
Versus
1. M/s Parsvnath Developers Limited, through its authorized signatories/Local Manager, Parsvnath Royal Panchkula, Sector-20, Panchkula.
2. M/s Parsvnath Developers Limited, through its Directors/Managing Directors, 6th Floor, Arunanchal Building, 19, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi.
3. M/s Parsvnath Developers Limited, through its authorized signatories/Directors/Managing Directors, SCO No.1, Sector-26, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh.
Judgment Debtors-Opposite Parties
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.
Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.
Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.
Present:- Shri J.S. Thakur, Attorney of Decree Holders alongwith Shri Arvind Chauhan, Advocate.
Shri Aftab Singh Khara, counsel for the Judgment Debtors.
O R D E R
NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Shri J.S. Thakur, Attorney of Decree Holders has made statement (Annexure-4) that he has received two demand drafts (Photocopy Annexure-1) amounting to Rs.5,00,000/- each and five post dated cheques (Photocopies Annexure-2 and 3) amounting to Rs.10,00,000/-, Rs.10,00,000/-, Rs.9,28,974/-, Rs.71,026/- and Rs.2,03,959/- respectively from Parsvnath Developers Limited-Judgment Debtors towards the amount awarded alongwith interest, compensation and litigation expenses vide order dated February 27th, 2017 passed by this Commission. The execution application be dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with liberty to file fresh execution application in case of default.
2. In view of above, the execution application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Announced 12.10.2017 | (Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member | (Balbir Singh) Judicial Member | (Nawab Singh) President |
D.R.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.