Haryana

StateCommission

MA/922/2024

KAMAL KUMAR KAKKAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S PANCHKULA AUTOMOBILES - Opp.Party(s)

KUSHALDEEP KAUR

27 Nov 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution: 11.07.2024

                                                          Date of final hearing: 27.11.2024

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 27.11.2024

 

 

MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No.922 of 2024

 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

Kamal Kumar Kakkar S/o  Shri Balwant Singh, R/o House No.182, Aashiana Flats, Sector-20, Panchkula.

 

 

                                      ….Complainant

Versus

 

 

 

1. M/s Panchkula Automobiles, 79 Industrial Area, Phase I, Panchkula through its Managing Director.
2. Tata Motors Ltd., SCO No.365-65-366, Sector-34, Chandigarh through its authorized signatory.
3. Managing Director Tata Motors Limited, Bombay House 24, Modi Street, Fort, Mumbai-400001.
4. Tata Motors Finance Ltd., SCO No.11, 1^st Floor, Madhaya, Sector 26, Chandigarh-160019.

 

....OppositeParties

 

         

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President

                   MR. S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                   Ms. MANJULA, MEMBER

                  

 

Present:     Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, counsel for the complainant/applicant.

                   None for respondent No.1.

                   None for respondent No.4.

 

 

 

 

PER: T.P.S. MANN, J.

 

 

ORDER

 

 

 

1. Counsel representing the complainant has apprised the State Commission that the complaint filed by the complainant has since been disposed of by directing the opposite parties as under:

“(i) The Ops No.1 & 2 are directed to repair the defects in the AC and replace the speedo meter of the car in question;

(ii) The Ops No.1 & 2 are also directed to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant on account of mental agony and harassment; and

(iii) The Ops No.1 and 2 are also directed to comply with the order within a period of 45 days from the date of communication of copy of this order failing which, the complainants shall be at liberty to approach the Commission for initiation of proceedings under Section 71/72 of CP Act, against Ops No.1 and 2.”

 

2. In view of the above, the present miscellaneous application filed by the complainant has been rendered infructuous and accordingly disposed of.
3. However, the complainant shall be at liberty to take appropriate proceedings against the order dated 24.09.2024, if so advised.
4. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
5. A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the law. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
6. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

(T.P.S. MANN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

(S.P. SOOD)

JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 

 

(MANJULA)

MEMBER 

Pronounced On: 27.11.2024

MS