BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ATHYDERABAD.
F.A. 1172/2006 against C.D. 54/2003, Dist. Forum,Kakinada.
Between:
Smt. Sangadi Yellaramma
W/o. Late Ganga Raju
Age: 53 years,
Opp. Sarvaraya Textiles
Kakinada, E.Godavari Dist. The Divisional Manager
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,
Jawahar Street, Salipet
Kakinada.
Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Resp:
QUORUM:
&
SMT. M. SHREESHA, MEMBER
TUESDAY,
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
under policy Dt. 10.9.1996 effective from 10.9.1996 to 9.12.1996..
of the accident, she reminded and when clarifications on some points were made they were answered. Kakinada. Kakinada and
she had insured the boat with them for Rs. 6,50,000/- and that there was cyclone on 6.11.1996, however it denied that the boat was sunk and lost.
to enquire into the matter which revealed that the claim of the complainant was bogus.
Kakinada
false and
to get a report in its favour .
We observed during our interrogation with the crew members that their statements
The insured had submitted a cancellation of registration, but not Marine Casualty Report.
The certificate of registry which was cancelled after the reported casualty
The condition of the vessel
Based on our enquiry/investigation into the sinking of vessel MFV.
Conclusion:
We do not intend to reiterate that port officer as well as police after due enquiry submitted their reports
We may mention herein for the incident happened on 6.11.1996 The insurance company for the reasons best known
sought for clarification on these questions.
In order to prove Kakinada. 1.1.1996 to 31.7.1996 vide receipt Dt. 1.8.1996. Kakinada.
cancellation letter.
The Dist. Forum simply basing on the certificate said to have been furnished by the Port Officer “whenever
Admittedly PW1 did not maintain the said register.
Only two conservators are at the fishing harbour
KothapalemSeaCoastKakinada
In
Therefore, we award Rs. 1,00,000/- towards compensation.
Dt. 23. 12. 2008.