BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALHYDERABAD.

FA.No.1401/2006 against CC.No.1028/2005 District Consumer Forum-I,Hyderabad.

Between:

G.V.Narasimhulu, S/Aged 43 years,

R/o.10-9,Dilsukhnagar,Hyderabad.

…Appellant/Complainant.

And

1.The

  DunlopBuilding,

  Public Garden Road,Hyderabad

2.TTK

  th

  Hyderabad

…Respondents/Counsel for the Appellant     

Counsel for the Respondents      

QUORUM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT,

AND

SMT.M.SHREESHA

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER,

TWO THOUSAND EIGHT.

Oral Order (Per

******* 

The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 

The case of the complainant is that he took aHyderabad  

The Insurance Company resisted the case.        

The District Forum after considering the evidence placed on record opined that the complainant had suppressed that he was having heart ailment and therefore, he was not entitled to the amount claimed.     

It is an undisputed fact that the complainant had taken policy, Ex.A.1 covering the period from 23.02.2004 to 22.02.2005 for Rs.1,50,000/-.        

PRESIDENT