Haryana

Rohtak

353/2018

Nirmal Dhaniya - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Omaxe Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Lalit Kaushik

22 Mar 2021

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.
Haryana.
 
Complaint Case No. 353/2018
( Date of Filing : 01 Aug 2018 )
 
1. Nirmal Dhaniya
w/o Sh. Satyawan Singh Dhaniya R/o H.No. 121 Vikas Nagar Rohtak.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Omaxe Ltd.
OP Tilyar Lake Delhi Road Rohtak, through its incharge/manager at Rohtak. 2. District Town Planner Rohtak, Sector 1 Rohtak.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian PRESIDENT
  Mrs. Tripti Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Mar 2021
Final Order / Judgement

Before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak.

 

                                                                        Complaint No. : 353.

                                                                        Instituted on     : 1.8.2018.

                                                                        Decided on       :  22.03.2021.

 

Nirmal Dhaniya, aged 52 years wife of Sh. Satyawan Singh Dhaniya, resident of House No.121 Vikas Nagar Rohtak.

                                                                                    ………..Complainant.

                                                Vs.

  1. Omaxe Ltd. Opposite Tilyar Lake Delhi Road, Rohtak, through its In-charge/Manager at Rohtak.
  2. Omaxe Ltd. 7 Local Shopping Center Kalkaji New Delhi 110019.
  3. District Town Planner Rohtak, Sector 1 Rohtak.
  4. Shanvi Estate Management Services (P) Ltdd., Having its registered Office at K-17, AB, Basement, Kalkaji New Delhi 110019.

……….Opposite parties.

 

Present:          Sh. Lalit Kaushik, Advocate for the complainant.

Sh. Anuraj Malik, Advocate for the Opposite parties no.1, 2 and 4.

                        Opposite party no.3 already exparte.

 

                        Matter was fixed for consideration. Ld. Counsel for the complainant made a statement on dated 18.3.2021 that settlement has been effected with the opposite parties in the present matter, so, he withdraws the present complaint.  

            In view of the made by statement ld. Counsel for the complainant on dated 18.3.2021, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Copy of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost.

                                    File be consigned to the record after due compliance.

Dated : 22.3.2021.

 

 

Member                                                                                 President

                                                                                                DCDRC, Rohtak

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Nagender Singh Kadian]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Mrs. Tripti Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.