Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/298/2012

Kuldeep Kumar Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd, - Opp.Party(s)

Divya Sharma

12 Jul 2013

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 298 of 2012
1. Kuldeep Kumar SharmaR/o Ward No. 23, Near Khalsa School Mandir Wali Gali, Khanna, Punjab. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd, through Managing Director, 10 LSC, Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019.2. M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd, through its Manager, SCO 141-143, Ist Floor, Sector 8/C, Chandigarh 160008.. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Divya Sharma, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 12 Jul 2013
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.298 of 2012

 

 

Kuldeep Kumar Sharma   Vs.    M/s Omaxe Chandigarh Extension                                                         Developers Pvt. Ltd. & anr.

  

PRESENT:

 

Ms.Divya Sharma, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.Munish Gupta, Counsel for OPs.

 

Dated the 12th day of July, 2013

 

ORDER

 

            Ms.Divya Sharma, Counsel for Complainant, has made the following statement, recorded separately;-

“Due to technical defect (jurisdiction), I do not press this complaint. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves his right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the appropriate authority/Court.”

 

            In view of the said statement made by counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the appropriate authority/Court, as per law. 

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

                        Sd/-                                                                              Sd/-

            (JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)                                         (MADHU MUTNEJA)

            MEMBER                                                                      PRESIDING MEMBER

 


MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, PRESIDING MEMBER ,