A. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION : ATHYDERABAD
F.A.No. 340 OF 2008 AGAINST C.C.NO.355 OF 2007 ON THE FILE OF HYDERABAD
Between :
Mrs. Shamsah Arif Panjwani
W/o Late Arif Sherali Panjwani
Aged about 36 years, Occ: House wife Flat No. 302
Green Gates, 1-8-201/205, Pendraghast road
Secunderabad – 500 003
And
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd
Divisional Office
EMCA House, 1st289,Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road
Fort, Mumbai – 400 001
Counsel for the Appellant
Counsel for the Respondent
QUORUM: SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER
&
SRI R.LAKSHMINARSIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER
Monday. The Seventh Day of June, Two Thousand Ten
Oral Order ( As per Sri Syed Abduallah, Hon’ble Member)
The appellant is the complainant in C.C. 355/2007
The facts of the case disclose that Subsequently, a reminder was also sent which was acknowledged by the opposite party.
The opposite party filed its counter denying any deficiency in service on its part mentioned in the complaint Further, Mumbai office only is made as party. As the transaction took place in between the Mumbai office and the opposite party, the District Forum has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the dispute. Proof of acceptance as part
During the enquiry, along with the evidence affidavit, the complainant filed Ex. A1 to A25 but the Opposite party has not filed any documentary evidence on its side.
The District Forum, after going through the evidence on record, had come to the conclusion that there is no cause of action to entertain the complaint since the opposite party is situate at Mumbai and the entire correspondence was made with
Point for consideration is, whether the impugned order suffers from any factual or legal infirmity for its interference ?
The District Forum has dismissed the complaint on the ground that the cause of action has not arisen within the jurisdiction of the District Forum II, Hyderabad
The Opposite party – New India Assurance Company Ltd has been transacting business from Hyderabad. assuring that When the opposite party Hyderabad,
There is an inadvertent delay was sent through cheque which
In the result,