Uttarakhand

StateCommission

EA/6/2019

Smt. Ganga Bisht - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Neesu Constrictions Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Neeraj Pandey

24 Mar 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
Execution Application No. EA/6/2019
( Date of Filing : 25 Jul 2019 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/09/4
 
1. Smt. Ganga Bisht
w/o late Kishore Yogiraj alis Kama Prakash Nautiayal r/o 2304 H.No. 5 Reheja Classic Kink Road, Oshiwara, Anderi West Mumbai,
2. Smt. Shreya Mishra
D/o late Kishore Yogiraj alis Kama Prakash Nautiayal r/o 2304 H.No. 5 Reheja Classic Kink Road, Oshiwara, Anderi West Mumbai,
Mumbai
Maharashtra
3. Rachita Bisht
D/o late Kishore Yogiraj alis Kama Prakash Nautiayal r/o 2304 H.No. 5 Reheja Classic Kink Road, Oshiwara, Anderi West Mumbai,
Mumbai
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Neesu Constrictions Pvt. Ltd.
its Reg. office at D-175 Bhajanpura Delhi
2. Sh. Kulveer Singh
S/o late Sh. Mokham Singh A-28 Rambihar Delhi
Delhi
Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 24 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of the applicants / decree holders.

Perusal of record reveals that none was also present on behalf of the applicants / decree holders on the previous date, i.e., 24.02.2023, on which date, following order was passed by this Commission:

“Case is called out.

None is present on behalf of either of the parties.

In view of order dated 08.02.2023, the applicants / decree holders were required to take steps for realization of decretal amount.

According to office report dated 24.02.2023, steps have not been taken by the applicants / decree holders.

No adjournment application has been moved on behalf of the applicants / decree holders.

In the interest of justice, one opportunity is provided to the applicants / decree holders.

Put up on 24.03.2023 for further orders.

Steps may be taken by the applicants / decree holders by the date fixed.”

Inspite of that, none has appeared on behalf of the applicants / decree holders even today and no adjournment application has also been moved on behalf of the applicants / decree holders.

According to office report dated 24.02.2023, steps for issuing realization certificate against the opposite parties / judgment debtors, have not been taken by the applicants / decree holders.

It appears that the applicants / decree holders are not interested in pursuing the execution application.

Accordingly, the execution application is dismissed in default of the applicants / decree holders.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.