Haryana

Panchkula

CC/280/2023

RAJEEV KUMAR CHAUDHARY - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S NATRAJ ENTERPRISES - Opp.Party(s)

AMMISH GOEL

01 Jan 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                                     

Consumer Complaint No.

:

280 of 2023

Date of Institution

:

17.11.2023

Date of Decision

:

01.01.2024

 

1.       Rajeev Kumar Chaudhary S/o Sh. Ved Parkash Chaudhary R/o House No. 757 Sector-16, Panchkula-134109 (Haryana)

2.       Himani Chaudhary W/o Sh. Rajeev Kumar Chaudhary R/o House No. 757 Sector-16, Panchkula-134109 (Haryana)

                                                                                      ­….Complainant

Versus

1.       M/s Natraj Enterprises through its Partner/Proprietor, SCO 320, Sector 35-B, Chandigarh, 160022.

2.       ICICI Bank Limited through its Chairman, Having its Registered Office at ICICI Bank Tower, Near Chakli Circle, Old Padra Road Vadodara (Gujurat)-390007.

3.       ICICI Bank Ltd. through its Branch Manager having its branch at Show Room No. 6, Sector-11, Panchkula (Haryana).

4.       L.G Electronics India Ltd. through its Managing Director having its office at A-24/6, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044.

….Opposite Parties

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 35 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 AS AMENDED UPTO DATE

Before:        Mr. Satpal, President.

                   Dr. Sushma Garg, Member.     

                   Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav, Member                              

 

Present:-      Sh. Ammish Goel, Advocate, for the Complainant.

 

                   The present complaint is fixed for 25.01.2024, but it is taken up today, on the application moved on behalf of the Complainants, seeking permission to withdraw the present case.

                   At this stage, the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the Complainant, by making a separate statement, states that the Complainant does not want to pursue with the present complaint due to some technical reasons; hence, he withdraws the same, seeking liberty to file it afresh.

                    Heard. In view of the statement made by the Ld. Counsel for the Complainant, the present complaint is hereby ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file it afresh, before the commission.

                   A copy of this order be sent to the Complainant, free of costs and File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

 

Dt.              (Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav)       (Dr.Sushma Garg)                   (Satpal)

01.01.2024         Member                                   Member                            President          

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.