Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/909/09

V.GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY (G.K.M.VALLURI) - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD.,REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT - Opp.Party(s)

MR.V.L.N.PANTULU

07 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/909/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. V.GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY (G.K.M.VALLURI)
TRAINEER OFFICER, STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD, PUNJAGUTTA,
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD.,REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT
10, GUNROCK ENCLAVE, SEC-BAD-500 009.
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
 
 

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.909 OF 2009 AGAINST C.C.No.275 OF 2009 DISTRICT FORUM-IIIHYDERABAD

 

Between:

V.Gopala Krishna Murthy (GKM Valluri)
Trainee Officer, State Bank ofHyderabad
Panjagutta,Hyderabad

                                                       A N D

M/s Narne Estates Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad-009
rep. by its President

                                                       

       

Counsel for the Appellant                    

Counsel for the Respondents

 

QUORUM:  SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER  

AND

SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

MONDAY THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH

  

 

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Hon’ble Member)

                                                       1.    The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant.

2.    The facts of the case as set out in the complaintthat the complainant had taken membership vide No.16708 and plot No.EC-IV-AA-65 `53,000/- by the year 1999.   `53,000/- paid by the complainant to the opposite party.    `41,900/- out of`53,000/- paid by him. `2500/- was deducted towards administrative charges and`5,000/- towards gift scheme charges and has not accounted for`3600/- which was the balance amount.  

3.    `30,000/- and costs of`2,000/-. `41,900/- already paid to him. 

4.     

5.     

6.    `54,000/- `2,000/-.

7.    `41,900/- in the last week of February 2008 by deducting the administrative charges from the amount paid by him and it has not accounted for deducting such amount and that the District Forum disposed of the instant complaint without considering the cause of action. 

8.    `8600/- fro the opposite party?

9.      `30,000/- towards compensation and`2,000/- towards costs. `32,000/- as awarded by the District Forum towards compensation and costs.

10.   `8600/- on the premise that the amount of Rs.3000/- and`5000/- which was deducted by the opposite party at the time of payment of`41,900/- during pendency of the complaint CC 500 of 2008 is unjust and unreasonable.  

11.   `41,900/- which is the remainder after the amount of administration charges and gift scheme charges were deducted from the amount paid by the complainant towards cost of the plot.  `30,000/- was awarded towards compensation and`2000/- towards litigation expenses. 

12.   `32,000/- as awarded by the District Forum and thus complied with the direction of the District forum.    

13.     `1,000/-.

 

 

                                                                        

 

                                                                                                                                      KMK*

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.