BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD.

F.A.No.393 OF 2007 AGAINST C.C.NO.659 OF 2006 DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-II HYDERABAD

Between
Mr.D.Balakrishna Rao S/o late Gurunadhan
Aged about 60 yrs, Occ: Retired
R/o H.No.8-3-168/20/12, Siddhartha Nagar (North)
Near A.G.Colony, Behind T.B.Hospital,
Hyderabad-38                                                                                                   

M/s Narne Estate Pvt Ltd.,
(through its Directors /officers/representatives)
having its office at No.10, Gun Rock Enclave
Secunderabad-09

Respondent/ opposite party

Counsel for the Appellant           

Counsel for the Respondent

QUORUM:    

&

Oral Order ( As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member)
                                           

       Hyderabad

        EastCity  The appellant paid a sum of Rs.10,000/- through cheque dated 2.1.1993 and another Rs.10,000/- through cheque dated 2.2.1993 towards the instalments.             

       EAStCity, paid an amount of Rs.10,150/- through cheque no.014386 dated 13.9.1992 to the respondent.           

        The respondent instead of making it clear how and why the appellant was not entitled to discount much less the 40% discount as claimed by him, simply issued Ex.B8 stating that the application filed earlier for the two plots by the appellant does not indicate any such discount and kept the hopes of the appellant alive by inviting him for discussion on the aspect of entitlement of the appellant to the discount on the cost of the plots.  the respondent as aforesaid had adopted unfair trade practice as the amount of Rs.2,500/- charged was not towards the cost of single plot but as an additional amount towards the additional charges for the purpose of allotment of a corner plot which was never opted for by the appellant.  

                                                                                kmk