Hemanta Patel filed a consumer case on 27 Jun 2022 against M/s Munda Gas Service in the Sambalpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/7/2017 and the judgment uploaded on 28 Jun 2022.
PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SAMBALPUR
Consumer Case No- 7/2017
Present-Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, President,
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, Member,
Hemanta Patel,
S/O- Late Rajkumar Patel
R/O-Modipara, Near P.K.Park, PO-Modipara,
PS-Town, Dist- Sambalpur, Odisha. …..Complainant
Vrs.
At-S.R.I.T Market, PO/Dist-Sambalpur.
At-A/4, Chadrasekharpur,, Bhubeneswar-751024
Indian Oil Bhavan, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg,
Bandra(East), Mumbai,
Maharastra-400051
Counsels:-
DATE OF HEARING : 25.04.2022, DATE OF JUDGEMENT :27.06.2022
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, MEMBER
Then again the Complainant booked for refill of gas, which was informed to the Complainant on his mobile bearing No.8984047915 by mobile on dt. 20/12/2016 and expected days of delivery of gas 6 to 8 days and on dtd. 5/1/2017 a message was sent to Complainant’s mobile that an amount of Rs. 191.51 has been credited to his account being the LPG subsidy remitted by 10CL and this time also neither the Complainant made any payment for gas nor he received refilled gas cylinder for booking No. 313977 on dtd. 20/12/2016. As per the written version in the complaint petition, the Complainant visited to the O.P. No.1 for eleven times within two months and due to deficiency of service of the O.Ps, the Complainant suffers harassment, mental agony and loss in his business.
Accordingly issues are settled,
ISSUE NO.1: Is the Complainant is the Consumer of the O.Ps?
The Complainant is one of the regular consumer of O.P.No.1, bearing consumer No. Cx20532547 who is LPG distributor and agent under the guidance and control of O.P. No.2 & 3.
ISSUE NO.2 Is there any deficiency of service in part of O.Ps?
The Complainant booked for refill of gas two times Ref. No. 308971 dtd 28.10.2016 and Ref. No. 313977 dtd. 20.12.2016 but no gas was delivered by the O.P. No.1 to the Complainant. In the delivered by the O.P. No.1 to the complaint. In the other hand in the office record of O.P.No.2 & 3 the gas was showed delivered and the subsidy has been credited in the account of the complaint. So the O.P. No.1 is only liable for deficiency of service.
ISSUE NO.3 Whether the Complainant is entitled for get any relief?
The Complainant is fully entitled for get reliefs what he claim in his complaint petition as the O.P.No.1 is liable for the deficiency in service.
So order is pronounced accordingly.
ORDER
The complaint petition is allowed on merit. The O.P. No.1 is directed to pay Rs. 592.50P for non supply of gas cylinder to the Complainant in time. Compensation of Rs. 50,000/- towards deficiency of service, mental agony and physical harassment to the consumer. Further directed to pay Rs. 5000/- towards litigation cost within 30 days from the date of this order, failing which the amount will carry interest @ 10% per annum till realization.
Order pronounced in the open court on this 27th day of June 2022.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.