Chandigarh

DF-II

CP/93/2009

Brij Bhushan Malhotra - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Moti Mahal Deluxm - Opp.Party(s)

Santokh Singh, Adv (C)

30 Aug 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 93 of 2009
1. Brij Bhushan Malhotra S/o Late SH. R.L.Malhotra, R/o # 2532, Telehos Colony, Sector 50-C, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Santokh Singh, Adv (C), Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 30 Aug 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Criminal Complaint No.93 of 2009

in

Complaint Case No.43 of 2009

 

 

Brij Bhushan Malhotra     Vs.     M/s Moti Mahal Delux & ors.

 

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Brij Bhushan Malhotra-Complainant in person.

Sh.Varun Katyal, Counsel for OPs.

 

Dated the 30th day of August, 2012

 

ORDER

1.         Vide order dated 27.8.2012 of this Forum passed in MA/82/2012, a sum of Rs.3,47,000/- was deposited by the OPs in compliance of the order dated 16.3.2009 passed by this Forum.

2.         Sh.Varun Katyal-Counsel for OPs has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“The OPs have no objection if a sum of Rs.3,47,000/- deposited on 27.8.2012 vide MA No.82 of 2012, with this Forum by the OPs is released in favour of the complainant.”

 

 

3.         So, the above said amount of Rs.3,47,000/- be released in favour of complainant alongwith interest, if any, accrued thereon.

4.         The complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“I have gone through the statement made today by Sh.Varun Katyal-Counsel for OPs. On receipt of the said amount, the order dated 16.3.2009 passed by this Forum, which was upheld by the Hon’ble State Commission, U.T. Chandigarh, shall be completely complied with. In these circumstances, I do not want to press this criminal complaint. It be dismissed being fully satisfied.”

 

5.         In view of the statement made by the complainant, this criminal complaint is dismissed being fully satisfied.

6.         Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

                        Sd/-                                                                 Sd/-

            (JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)                             (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)

                        MEMBER                                                          PRESIDENT


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER