Complaint Case No. CC/169/2022 | ( Date of Filing : 23 Mar 2022 ) |
| | 1. MRS. MANIPARNA RAY | Married D/o Sri Shankar Ray Of Santosh Garden, 1st Floor, Phase-III, P.O. AND P.S.-Jadavpur, Kol-700032, Within the local limits of this learned Commission. | 2. Sri Shankar Ray S/O Late Sukha Ranjan Roy of 50/1, Swami Vivekananda Road, Santosh Garden, 1st floor, Phase III, P.O. & P.S. Jadavpur, Kol-32 and | presently residing at Bhalo-Basa Apartment, 251, Brizi East, 4th floor, Flat No. A-7, Garia, Kol-84, within the local of this commission. |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
Versus | 1. M/S MILLENNIUM INDIA CONSTRUCTION | a Partnership Firm having its registered office at 23/15, Naktala Road, P.O.-Naktala, P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, Within the local limits of this learned Commission. | 2. SRI DEBASISH SARKAR | S/O Sri Kamal Sarkar, residing at 287, Ganguly Bagan, P.O.-Naktala, P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047,one of the Partners of the O.P. No. 1, Within the local limits of this learned Commission. | 3. SRI SAMIR KUMR HALDER | S/O LT. Sudhir Kumar Halder, residing at 4/45, Vidyasagar, P.O.-Naktala, P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, one of the Partners of the O.P. No. 1, Within the local limits of this learned Commission. | 4. SMT. NANDITA ROY. W/O LT. Nani Lal Roy, | residing at KMC Premises No. 255/55, N.S.C. Bose Road (Postal Address 2/60, Naktala), P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, in the District of South 24 Pgs,Within the local limits of this Learned Commission. | 5. SRI SOMESWAR ROY, S/O LT. Nani Lal Roy, | residing at KMC Premises No. 255/55, N.S.C. Bose Road (Postal Address 2/60, Naktala), P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, in the District of South 24 Pgs,Within the local limits of this Learned Commission. | 6. SRI SAILESWAR ROY, S/O LT. Nani Lal Roy, | residing at KMC Premises No. 255/55, N.S.C. Bose Road (Postal Address 2/60, Naktala), P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, in the District of South 24 Pgs,Within the local limits of this Learned Commission. | 7. SMT. SABITA SIKDAR, W/O Sri Sankar Sikdar and D/O LT. Nani Lal Roy, | residing at KMC Premises No. 255/55, N.S.C. Bose Road (Postal Address 2/60, Naktala), P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, in the District of South 24 Pgs,Within the local limits of this Learned Commission. | 8. MISS. SUNITA ROY, D/O LT. Nani Lal Roy, | residing at KMC Premises No. 255/55, N.S.C. Bose Road (Postal Address 2/60, Naktala), P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, in the District of South 24 Pgs,Within the local limits of this Learned Commission. | 9. MISS. SIBANI ROY, D/O LT. Nani Lal Roy, | residing at KMC Premises No. 255/55, N.S.C. Bose Road (Postal Address 2/60, Naktala), P.S.-Netaji Nagar, Kol-700047, in the District of South 24 Pgs,Within the local limits of this Learned Commission. |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
Final Order / Judgement | Date of Filing : 23/03/2022 Date of Judgement : 28.11.2023 Sri Sudip Niyogi, Hon’ble President Brief Facts OP 2 & 3 being the partners of OP 1 – an unregistered partnership firm are the owners of 5/6th share of the subject premises by way of purchasing of the same from the original owner and OP 4 to 9 are the owners of 1/6th share of the subject premises situated at No. 255/55, N.S.C. Bose Road, postal address (2/16) Naktala, P.S. Netaji Nagar, Kolkata 700 047. OPs 4 to 9 jointly entered into a registered development agreement executed on 12/12/2014 with OP 1 in order to develop the said property, one power of attorney was also executed on the same day by which OPs 4 to 9 nominated and authorized OP No. 2 & 3 being the partners of OP 1, to develop the property and do all acts and deeds etc. as stated in the said document. Subsequently, the complainants entered into an agreement with the developer i.e. OP 1, 2 & 3 to purchase one 1150 sq.ft. super built up area more or less with one car parking space on the ground floor at a consideration of Rs.46,00,000/- and at the time of execution and registration of the said document complainants paid Rs.11 lakh and agreed to pay the balance consideration in terms of the agreement for sale. However, they paid a sum of Rs.37,50,000/- in total and were ready and willing to pay the balance consideration of Rs.8,50,000/- at the time of registration of the deed of conveyance and handing over the possession of the said flat and car parking space. According to agreement, the complainants were to receive their flat within 18 months from the date of the said agreement, but the said developers failed to complete the construction work and handover the physical possession of the same to the complainants within the stipulated time as agreed upon. Complainants availed bank loans to acquire the said property and repaid the entire loan without getting possession of the subject property and sustained a huge loss of Rs.40,72,000/-. Complainant No. 1 is a working lady and complainant No. 2 is a senior citizen suffering from co-morbidities. They requested repeatedly to the developers to execute the sale deed and handover the physical possession of the subject property. They also lodged a complaint with the concerned P.S. So, they approached this commission in order to get execution and registration of a deed of conveyance of the subject property on payment of balance consideration. Initially OP 1, 2 & 3 and 8 entered appearance but they did not file any written version. The notice against the other OPs were issued through newspaper publication, but none of them appeared to contest the case. So, the complaint was heard exparte. Now, the point for determination is, whether the complainant is entitled to any relief(s) in this case. Findings In order to substantiate their contention, complainants filed one original agreement for sale and also the copies of money receipts showing payment made by them on different dates. It is found from these documents that complainants had made the said agreement for sale with the developers i.e. OP 1, 2 & 3 on 6/5/2015 whereby they had agreed to buy the scheduled property i.e. the flat and the car parking space at a consideration of Rs.46,00,000/-. The stipulated time for delivery of the said property was 18 months from the date of the agreement. It is also found that the complainants paid the amount of Rs.37,50,000/- to the developers towards consideration and they made it clear that they would pay the balance consideration at the time of execution and registration of the document and handover the property to them. So, on going through the materials on record and considering the unchallenged testimony of the complainant, it is found that the complainants are entitled to relief(s) in this case as prayed for. Therefore, the instant complaint should be allowed against the OPs and complainants are also entitled to Litigation cost of Rs.10,000/-. Hence, it is ORDERED That the instant complaint is allowed exparte against the OPs. OPs are directed to execute and register a deed of conveyance in favour of the complainants on receipt of the balance consideration from them in accordance with the agreement for sale dt. 6/1/2015. OP 1, 2 & 3 are also directed to pay litigation cost of Rs.10,000/- to the complainants. The aforesaid order shall be complied with by the OPs within 45 days from the date of this order failing which the complainants shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. Dictated and corrected by me President | |