District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab) District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001 consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/257
Jagdeep Singh
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
M/S Manter,Audio video Hindel Communication, Nokia Indai Pvt Ltd
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for the opposite party No.3. Stated that opposite party No.3 is ready to refund the payment of Rs7,950/- (Rupees Seven Thousand Nine Hundred and Fifty Only) for mobile set in question which was purchased on 24.3.08 within 30 days from today against original job sheet of mobile set in question . The amount will be deposit in the shape of cheque in the Forum in the name of complainant. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 30.11.09. Statement of Sh.Jagdeep Singh son of Sh.Pritam Singh,aged about 19 years Resident of Kothi No.143,Phase-3,Urban Estate,Bathinda, student,complainant on oath alongwith his counsel Sh.Amanpal Singh,counsel for the complainant W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.3 as stated by Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for opposite party No.3, on behalf of the complainant. In view of the statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal, I may kindly be allowed to withdraw the complaint. I shall handover the original job sheet of mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.3 through their counsel at same time. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 30.11.09 30.11.09 Present: Sh. Amanpal Singh,counsel for the complainant alongwith complainant in person. Sh.Sukhdev Milttal,counsel for opposite party No.3. None for opposite party No.1. Sh.Sanjay Goyal,counsel for opposite party No.2. Counsel for the opposite party No.3 and complainant have made the above statements, they are bound by their statements. In view of statements of the complainant and learned counsel for the opposite party No.3, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. The opposite party No.3 is directed to refund the payment of Rs.7,950/- in the shape of cheque in this Forum on 04.01.2010 and complainant is directed to handover the original job sheet of mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.3 at the same time. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
