Pondicherry

Pondicherry

CC/15/2016

R. Subramanian, - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Mani Electronics,and two others - Opp.Party(s)

G. Iyanar

03 Jul 2017

ORDER

Final Order1
Final Order2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/2016
 
1. R. Subramanian,
No.3/5 ECR Road, Keezhputhupattu Chavadi, Villipuram Dt, Pin 605 014
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Mani Electronics,and two others
No.271/2 Maraimalai Adikal Salai, Puducherry- 605001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN PRESIDENT
  MR. V.V. STEEPHEN MEMBER
  D. KAVITHA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 03 Jul 2017
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                    BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PONDICHERRY

 

                                        C.C.No.15/2016

                                               

Dated this the  3rd day of July 2017

 

(Date of Institution: 11.04.2016)

 

R. Subramanian,

No.3/5 ECR Road           

Keezhputhupattu Chavadi         

Villupuram District – 605 014.

     ..…Complainant     

vs

                                 

1.  M/s Mani Electronics               

     No.271/2 Maraimalai Adigal Salai

     Pondicherry – 605 001.

 

2.  M/s TVS Electronics Ltd.,

     Authorised Samsung Service Centre

     Tower 1, Bascon Maeru Towers

     82, Kodambakkam High Road       

     Chennai – 600 034.  

 

3. The Manager

    M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt Ltd.,

    24, Dr. Radhakrishnan Salai

    Chennai – 600 004.

                                                                                                            …...Opposite Parties

BEFORE:

 

          THIRU.A.ASOKAN, B.A., B.L.,

          PRESIDENT 

 

Thiru V.V. STEEPHEN, B.A., LL.B.,

           MEMBER

 

Tmt. D. KAVITHA, B.A., LL.B.,

           MEMBER

         

FOR THE COMPLAINANT            :  Thiru G. Iyanar, Advocate        

 

FOR THE OPPOSITE PARTIES      :  OP1 and OP2: Ex parte.

                                                               OP3 M/s V.V. Giridhar and P. Suresh,

Advocates

 

                                                       O R  D  E  R

 

This is a complaint filed by the complainant under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to direct the opposite parties to refund Rs.34,300/- the cost of the Fridge and to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and physical sufferings and to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- towards cost of this complaint.      

2.  Notice to opposite parties were duly served.  The first and second Opposite parties remained absent and set ex parte.  The third opposite party filed reply version.  Hence, the matter was posted for complainant's side evidence. 

          3. Today this complaint was called.  Complainant and Counsel absent.  The third opposite party and Counsel absent.  Complainant called absent for more than six hearings.  No representation made.  No efforts taken by the complainant to adduce evidence and to proceed the matter.  No interest shown by the complainant.  Hence, this complaint is hereby dismissed for default.    No costs. 

Dated this the 3rd day of July 2017.

 

  1. ASOKAN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

(V.V. STEEPHEN)

MEMBER

 

 

 

(D. KAVITHA)

MEMBER

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.ASOKAN]
PRESIDENT
 
[ MR. V.V. STEEPHEN]
MEMBER
 
[ D. KAVITHA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.