Haryana

Panchkula

CC/20/2024

SAI RISHU SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD - Opp.Party(s)

RAKESH SHARMA

05 Feb 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                                     

Consumer Complaint No.	:	20 of 2024
Date of Institution	:	18.01.2024
Date of Decision	:	05.02.2024

 

Sai Rishu Sharma age __ years son of Sh. Shiv Dutt Sharma, resident of House No. 1233, Sector 7, Panchkula, Haryana.

 

                                                                                      ­….Complainant

Versus

1.       M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. C/o Harbir Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. (HBS Motors) Plot No. 350, Industrial Area, Phase 2, Panchkula Through its Managing Director/ Director.

2.       Harbir Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. (HBS Motors) Plot No. 350, Industrial Area, Phase 2, Panchkula Through its Prop./Authorized Signatory.

3.       Sh. Vijay Saini, Service Head, Harbir Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. (HBS Motors) Plot No. 350, Industrial Area, Phase 2, Panchkula.

4.       Sh. Yogesh Employee, Harbir Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. (HBS Motors) Plot No. 350, Industrial Area, Phase 2, Panchkula.

5.       Sh. Rohit Bhalla Employee, Harbir Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. (HBS Motors) Plot No. 350, Industrial Area, Phase 2, Panchkula.

6.       M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Dr. G.M. Bhosale Marg, Worli, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400018 Through its Managing Director/Director. 

….Opposite Parties

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 35 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 AS AMENDED UPTO DATE

Before:        Mr. Satpal, President.

                   Dr. Sushma Garg, Member.     

                   Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav, Member                              

 

Present:-      Sh. Shubham Mittal, Advocate, for the Complainant.

 

                   Today the complaint is fixed for consideration on its admissibility. During Consideration, the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the Complainant, by making a separate statement, has stated that the Complainant does not want to pursue with the present complaint due to some technical reasons; hence, he withdraws the same on behalf of the Complainant, seeking liberty to file it afresh.

                    Heard. In view of the statement made by the Ld. Counsel for the Complainant, the present complaint is hereby ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file it afresh, before the Appropriate Authority/Tribunal/Competent Court etc.

                   A copy of this order be sent to the Complainant, free of costs and File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

 

Dt.              (Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav)       (Dr.Sushma Garg)                   (Satpal)

05.02.2024         Member                                   Member                            President