Haryana

Karnal

CC/263/2022

Shri Karambir - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Service Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Vikas Kumar

03 Nov 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.263 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.04.05.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:03.11.2023

 

Karambir Son of late Sh. Rajinder R/o 341, Banso gate, Matak Majri, Karnal.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

  1. Proprietor, M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited, 2nd floor, 87 & 88 Mahila Ashram Complex opposite old bus stand, Karnal.
  2. Managing Director, M/s Royal Sundram General Insurance Company Limited, Plot No.136, Sector-44, Gurgaon.
  3. Royal Sundram General Insurance Company Limited, Vishranthi Melaram Towers No.2/319, Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR), Karapakkam, Chennai-600097, Tel. No.044-71177117 having its registered office at 21 Patullos road, Chennai-600002.
  4. M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited, Gateway building, Appollo Bunder, Mumbai-400001 having its corporate office 2nd floor Sadhana House, behind Mahindera Towers, 570 PB marg, Worli, Mumbai-400018.

 

                        ....Opposite party.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

               

Present:   None for the complainant.

                Sh. Amit Sachdeva, counsel for the OPs-1 to 4.

                Sh. A.K.Vohra, counsel for the OPs-2 & 3.

                                                 

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the third last opportunity. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 03:30 PM. No further wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs-1 to 4 on 26.08.2022 and OPs-2 & 3 on 16.11.2022. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities includinglast three opportunity for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:03.11.2023             

 President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.