Haryana

Ambala

CC/40/2023

GURJANT SINGH. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S LUXMI TRADING CO. - Opp.Party(s)

JARNAIL SINGH ,CLERK.

27 May 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no.          :      40 of 2023.

                                                          Date of Institution          :      03.02.2023.

                                                          Date of decision     :              27.05.2024.

 

Gurjant Singh aged 31 years son of Shri Sher Singh, permanent resident of Village Rattanheri Tehsil Ambala Cantt. and District Ambala, State Haryana.

                                                                 ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

     1.       M/s Luxmi Trading Company, #177, New Grain Market, Gate No.1, Ambala  City, through its Proprietor.

     2.       M/s Parbhat Seed Traders, Near Power House, Village Amin District Kurukshetra through its Authorized Signatory.

 

                                                                                                                                                        ….…. Opposite Parties.       

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member            

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

                   Shri Dinesh Sharma, Advocate, counsel for the OPs.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to deposit of cost of Rs.600/-, in the legal aid account of this Commission, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even from the last three dates of hearing i.e. 22.02.2024, 22.03.2024 and 09.05.2024, none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced: 27.05.2024

 

          Member                         Member                                                                        President

                                                                            DCDRC, Ambala