BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.

FA 941 

Between:

Maddi Laxmi, W/o. Bondyalu

Age: 31 years, Household

R/o. Rollakallu Village

Parvathagiri Mandal

Warangal Dist.                                                                           1) 

Rep. by its Branch Manager

Pochamma Maidan

Warangal

2) 

Rep. by its 

Warangal Division, Balasamudram

Warangal                                                                                                                                                           

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Respondent: 

CORAM:

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO, PRESIDENT.

&

MONDAY, THIS THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND ELVEN

ORAL ORDER:

***

1) 

2)               

3)                                

4)                    

5)                    

6)                            

7)               

8)                      Reasons for submitting a non-standard proof of age :

i)       

ii)      

         iii)     

iv)     

v)       

Due to non-availability of records her statement as to the age was accepted.       no records’.   and I am satisfied that she cannot submit      voter’s identity card wherein there was mention that she was aged 47 years as on 1.1.1995.    

9)         at the time when the policy was issued,   

10)                                

It is only       

11)         

1)PRESIDENT 

2)      MEMBER 

3)      MEMBER 

11/07/2011

*pnr

UP LOAD – O.K.