Uttarakhand

StateCommission

RP/21/2021

Canara Bank (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s KMC Plastochem - Opp.Party(s)

Smt. Savita Sethi

03 Jan 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
Revision Petition No. RP/21/2021
( Date of Filing : 06 Sep 2021 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/12/2020 in Case No. 342/2020 of District Haridwar)
 
1. Canara Bank (Erstwhile Syndicate Bank
Head office 112 J.C. Raod, Banglore and amongst others one Branch at Lisa Bhawa, Njibabad Raod, Kotdwar, Pauri, through Auth. Sig. and attorney vinay Kumar Singh Divi. Manager, Regional office II Canara Bank, Ist floor IDA tower, 46, EC Raod, near Dwarka Store
Dehradun
Uttarakhand
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/s KMC Plastochem
through its Sole Prop. Sh. Naveen Kumar Gupta situated at Plot No. A-2B & A-2C, Industrial estate Growth Center, Sigaddi, Kotdwar
Pauri Garhwal
Uttarakhand
2. New India Assurance company Ltd.
head office 87 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Fort Mumbai
Maharashtra
3. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Divisional office situated at Ranipur More,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
4. Regional Manager
SIDCUL Industrial Estate Growth Centre Sigaddi Kotdwar
Pauri Garhwal
Uttarakhand
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 03 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

Smt. Savita Sethi, learned counsel for the revisionist is present.

Sh. Anuj Kumar Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party No. 4.

Sh. Sahil Mullick, learned counsel for opposite party No. 1 is also present.

None is present on behalf of rest of the opposite parties.

Copy of order-sheet dated 23.02.2022 of District Commission, Haridwar pertaining to consumer complaint No. 342 of 2020; M/s KMC Plastochem Vs. The New India Assurance Company and others, has been filed by learned counsel for opposite party No. 4, according to which, the consumer complaint has been dismissed by the District Commission in non-prosecution.

Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that she has no instructions from the revisionist – bank that the consumer complaint has been restored.  Thus, the revision petition has been rendered infructuous.

Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed, being infructuous.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.