Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/19/227

GEORGE K PAUL - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S KALANIKETHAN FASHION LTD - Opp.Party(s)

22 Dec 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/19/227
( Date of Filing : 07 Jun 2019 )
 
1. GEORGE K PAUL
KODOPARAMBIL H THAMANNAM ERNAKULAM
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S KALANIKETHAN FASHION LTD
KARITHALA DESOM OPP.SHENOY THEATRE MG RD KOCHI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 22 Dec 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ERNAKULAM

       Dated this the 22nd day of December 2022                                                                                                

                             Filed on: 07/06/2019

PRESENT

Shri.D.B.Binu                                                                          President

Shri.V.Ramachandran                                                              Member

Smt.Sreevidhia.T.N                                                                 Member                                                                  

CC NO.227/2019

Between

COMPLAINANT

George K. Paul, S/o. K.V. Paulose,  Kodoparambil House, 32/128A, Thammanam P.O., Ernakulam 682032.

 

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

Kalanikethan Fashions Pvt. Ltd., Shop No. 2562/1, Karithala Desom, Opp. Shenoy’s Theatre, MG Road, Ernakulam 682035.

(Rep. by Adv. Peter M. Paul, Thamarassery Road, Ernakulam 682028)

 

FINAL O R D E R

DB.Binu, President

The complaint was filed under Section 12 (1) of the Consumer Protection Act,1986. The complainant is absent and has no representation from his side. The case is posted for the evidence of the complainant. The Commission has issued notice to the complainant to appear before the Commission and to adduce evidence if any and contacted the complainant over his phone. The complainant is absent and no evidence adduced by the complainant to date. So many chances were given to the complainant to adduce evidence. The complainant is not interested to proceed further.

  Hence the complaint is closed as the default of the complainant.

Pronounced in the open Commission on this the Dated this the 22nd day of December 2022.

 

Sd/-

                                                                             D.B.Binu, President

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

                                                                             V. Ramachandran, Member

 

                                                                                         Sd/-

Sreevidhia.T.N, Member         

Forwarded/by Order

 

 

Assistant Registrar

 

Despatch date:

By hand:     By post                                                  

kp/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC No.227/2019

                                                                   Order Date: 22/12/2022                                                                                                

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.B BINU]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAMACHANDRAN .V]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SREEVIDHIA T.N]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.