Chandigarh

DF-I

CP/73/2010

Bivake Gill - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Jet Lite India Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

13 May 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 73 of 2010
1. Bivake GillS/o Sh. Yadwinder Gill R/o #358 Sec.16 Pkl. Presently Residing at 4570 South 20th Street Apartment-I Milkwauke Wisconsin Pin-53221(USA) through Sh. Anil Goyal R/o #354 Sector-16 Pkl. authorized Representative of Complainat ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. M/s Jet Lite India Ltd.Domestic Airport, New Delhi2. M/s Jet Lite India Ltd.Chandigarh Airport Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 13 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                            Criminal Complaint No.73 of 2010

in

Complaint Case No. 970 of 2008

 

 

Bivake Gill s/o Sh.Yadvinder Gill R/o # 358, Sec 16, Pkl. presently residing at 4570 South, 20th Street Apartment-I, Milwauke, Wisconsin, Pin 53221 (USA) through Sh.Anil Goyal R/o # 354, Sec.16, Pkl. Authorized representative of complainant.                                                                          –              Complainant

 

                                                Versus

 

1.         M/s Jet Lite India Ltd. Domestic Airport, New Delhi.,

2.         M/s Jet Lite India Ltd., Chandigarh Airport, Chandigarh.                                                                                                                –            Opposite Parties

 

Present:          Ms.Anuradha Gupta, Advocate for Complainant.

                                               

                                                            ORDER

 

                        In view of the statement made by counsel for complainant, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant would be at liberty to file afresh execution application after removal of the defect, as permitted by law.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

 

13.05.2010      (MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA)      (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)       (ASHOK RAJ BHANDARI)

                          MEMBER                                                     MEMBER                                              PRESIDING MEMBER                                

 


DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,