Haryana

Karnal

CC/493/2022

Sunita Devi - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s JD Universal Infra Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sudhakar Mittal

18 Jun 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                     Complaint No.493 of 2022

                                                                     Date of instt.25.08.2022

                                                                     Date of Decision:18.06.2024

 

1. Sunita Devi wife of Sh. Sube Singh, resident of House No.1920, Sector-9, Urban Estate, Karnal.
2. Kamla Devi, wife of Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, resident of House No.50-A, R.K.Puram, Karnal.
3. Naresh Kumar son of Sh. Tara Chand, resident of Village Khera Chhapra, P.O.Subari, Karnal.

 

                                                                                      …….Complainants.

                                                Versus

1. M/s JD Universal Infra Ltd., through its Director/Authorized Signatory, having its registered office situated at House No.1008, Sector-13, Urban Estate, Karnal.
2. Raj Kumar Juneja, Director/Authorized Signatory M/s JD Universal Infra Ltd., having its registered office situated at House No.435, JD House, Sector-8, Urban Estate Karnal.
3. Urban and Local Bodies, Haryana, Panchkula through Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Karnal.
4. Sub Registrar, Mini Secretariat, Sector-12, Karnal.

                                                                                      …..Opposite Parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before       Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                   Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

 

Present: Sh. Sudhakar Mittal, Counsel for the Complainant.

              Sh. S.K.Patlan, Proxy Counsel for the OP-1.

              OP-2 defence struck off vide order dated 24.11.2022.

              Sh. Ravi Chauhan, Proxy Counsel for the OP-3.

              OP-4 exparte vide order dated 20.10.2022.

                                           

       Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the second last opportunity. No evidence is present.

       Learned counsel for the complainant has suffered his separate statement to effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint further and withdraws the same on technical ground and sought permission to file the fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.     

              In view of the above statement the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies of the same. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:18.06.2024.                

                      President,      

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh)

   Member                   Member