Orissa

Ganjam

CC/95/2017

Smt. Sanjukta Kumar Behera - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Jayashakti Developer Pvt. Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Satish Kumar Panigrahi, and Bigneswar Padhi

25 Mar 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/95/2017
( Date of Filing : 01 Dec 2017 )
 
1. Smt. Sanjukta Kumar Behera
W/o Sri Manas Kumar Behera, Govt. Service by profession, Residing at Prangyalaya, Hillpatna, Berhampur, Ps: B.N.Pur, Po: Hillpatna, Pin:760 005, Ganjam, Being represented through her, Special Power of Attorney Dtd, Sri Manas Kumar Behera, 47yrs, S/o Late Dandapani Behera, Residing at Prangylalaya, H
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Jayashakti Developer Pvt. Ltd
Office: DDA Square, Baidyanathnagar-Lane1, Engineering School Road, Berhampur - 760 010, Ps: B.N.Pur, Ganjam, Represented by its, Managing Director, Rabindra Kumar Sahu, aged about 42 yrs, S/o Late Sarat Chandra Sahu, Resident of Panigrahi Street, Po/Ps/ViII: Gosaninuagaon, Berhampur, Ganjam, 760 0
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Karunakar Nayak MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr. Satish Kumar Panigrahi, and Bigneswar Padhi, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Mr. Bijaya Krishna Mohanty, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 25 Mar 2021
Final Order / Judgement

DATE OF DISPOSAL: 25.03.2021

Dr. Aswini Kumar  Mahapatra, President: 

 

                        The advocate for complainant is present and filed a not pressed memo contended therein that after amicable settlement between both the parties, the sale deed relating to the Flat in question has already been registered in favour of the complainant and the said flat has already been handed over to the complainant with full and final satisfaction of her claim as per terms and conditions of the agreement  by the O.P. and the complainant is now in peaceful possession having  right title and interest over the said flat. As thus the complainant do not want to proceed in the case further. Hence prayed to drop the case. Heard the complainant, perused the record, verified the memo and the registered sale deed of the said flat submitted by the O.Ps earlier.

                        Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as the dispute is already resolved amicably between the parties memo is allowed. Accordingly we dropped this proceeding against the O.Ps as not pressed by the advocate for the complainant.

                        Issue copy of order to the parties free of cost.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dr. Aswini Kumar Mohapatra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Karunakar Nayak]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.