Haryana

Faridabad

CC/298/2022

Rajeev Nangia s/o Narayan Dass Nagia - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Yuvraj Nagia

04 Jan 2023

ORDER

Distic forum Faridabad, hariyana
faridabad
final order
 
Complaint Case No. CC/298/2022
( Date of Filing : 01 Jun 2022 )
 
1. Rajeev Nangia s/o Narayan Dass Nagia
H. no. 5-H/57, NIT
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd.
Unit No. 209, 2nd Floor
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ,Faridabad.

 

Consumer Complaint  No.298/2022.

 Date of Institution: 01.06.2022.

Date of Order: 04.01.2023.

Rajeev Nangia son of Sh, Narayan Dass Nangia, resident of House No. 5-H/57, NIT, Faridabad, District Faridabad, Aadhar card. NO. 476108559156, mobile NO. 9811268734.

                                                                   …….Complainant……..

                                                Versus

M/s. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited, Unit NO. 209, 2nd floor,, SSR Corporation Park, 13/6, Delhi Mathura Road, Sector-27B, Faridabad – 121003 through its Divisional Manager/Principal Officer.

                                                                   …Opposite party……

Complaint under section-12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Now  amended  Section 34 of Consumer protection Act 2019.

BEFORE:            Amit Arora……………..President

Mukesh Sharma…………Member.

Indira Bhadana………….Member.

PRESENT:                   Sh. Rajeev Nangia, complainant in person.

                             Sh.  Rakesh Dabaas, counsel for opposite party.

 

 

ORDER:  

                   Today the case was fixed for arguments.

                   During the course of arguments, Shri Rajeev Nangia, complainant in person has made a statement that I do not want to pursue the present complaint and wants to withdraw the same due to some technical fault and permission may kindly be granted to file fresh complaint before this competent court/Commission.

                    In view of the statement of the complainant, the complaint  is dismissed as withdrawn.  However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint/suit or any other proceedings before any competent Commission/Authority/Court. The complainant can claim benefit of Section 14A of the Limitation Act to exclude the period spent in prosecuting proceedings under the Consumer Protection Act,  before this Commission while computing the period of limitation.  File be consigned to the record room.

Announced on: 04.01.2023                       

             (Amit Arora)

                                                                                  President

                     District Consumer Disputes

           Redressal  Commission, Faridabad.

 

                                                (Mukesh Sharma)

                Member

          District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Commission, Faridabad.

 

                                                (Indira Bhadana)

                Member

          District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Commission, Faridabad.

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.