Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1610/08

MR.A.V.PRASAD - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S HOME LINE CONSTRUCTIONS - Opp.Party(s)

M/S M.V.HANUMANTHA RAO

28 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1610/08
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry)
 
1. MR.A.V.PRASAD
FLAT NO.101, SAI BALAJI RESIDENCY OPP.C.B.R.ESTATE, DEEPTI SREENAGAR, MIYAPUR.
RANGA REDDY
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M/S HOME LINE CONSTRUCTIONS
REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER V.RAMESH G-2 KALYANI ENCLAVE, KAMALNAGAR, ECIL, HYDERABAD-62.
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
2. MR.V.RAMESH
MANAGING PARTNER OF HOME LINE CONSTRUCTIONS ECIL.
HYDERABAD
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 1610/2008  

Between:

 

A. V. Prasad, S/o. A. Shankar Rao

Flat No. 101, Sai Balaji Residency

Opp. C.B.R. Estate, Deepthisree Nagar

Miapur, Ranga Reddy Dist.                                                                            And

1)  

Rep. by  V. Ramesh, G2 Kalyani Enclave

Kamalanagar, ECIL,Hyderabad

 

2) 

Builder/developer

Managing Home Line Construction 

G2 Kalyani Enclave

Kamalanagar, ECIL,Hyderabad                                                                                                                

 

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resp:             

                                     CORAM:

                       

                                     

&

                                     

 

MONDAY, THIS THE TWENTY EIGTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

 

1)      

 

2)                    The respondent handed over possession in the month of       However, to his dismay               At the time of repair work he observed dust comprising of                           

 

3)                                     instead of concrete and cement     filling the basement with required material.              

 

4)                 

 

5)               

 

6)                 

 

 

 

7)      

 

 

8)                internal walls.     Since there were damages                     our workers                and surrounding     

 

 

 

 

 

9)         while constructing the basement,            The respondent admits that flooring was shrunken which he attributes to bandicoots.      or                            did not file          

10)         Chartered Architects & Engineers           many of the complaints            has no application.                

 

 

11)                    The Dist. Forum shall not carry away by the observations made this Commission     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12)                     as per law after      

 

 

         1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)      MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

3)      MEMBER

             

*pnr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“UP LOAD – O.K.”

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.