Haryana

Karnal

CC/240/2024

Kamal Neil Suri - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Harsha Relocations Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Atul Malhotra

05 Jun 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                     Complaint No.240 of 2024

                                                                     Date of instt.17.05.2024

                                                                     Date of Decision:05.06.2024

 

Kamal Neil Suri son of Sh. Om Parkash Suri, resident of House no.665, Sector-8, Urban Estate, Karnal, now resident of TEXAS ZIP 75056, USA, through its special power of attorney holder Mr. Deepak Dureja sonof Sh. Bansi Lal Dureja, resident of Gali no.7, near Vijeta School, Karan Vihar, Karnal.

 

                                                                                      …….Complainant.

                                                Versus

1. M/s Harsha Relocations Pvt., Ltd., TF-2, SVN’s Sarika Pyadayya Towers DNo.58-30-3/2, Sakethapuram NAD Post, Visakhaptnam-53009, through Mr. Gautam Move coordinator.
2. Mr. Gautam Move coordinator of M/s M/s Harsha Relocations Pvt., Ltd., TF-2, SVN’s Sarika Pyadayya Towers DNo.58-30-3/2, Sakethapuram NAD Post, Visakhaptnam-53009.
3. Mr. Vijay Kestwal son of Shri Swayambar Dutt, resident of House no.D-127, gali no.2, Sangam Vihar, New Delhi-110062.
4. Harsha Packers and Movers, Logistic Services Shankar Vihar, Sector-104, Gurugram, Haryana through its Manager.

                                                                                      …..Opposite Parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before       Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                   Dr. Suman Singh………….Member.

 

Present: Sh. Atul Malhotra, Counsel for the Complainant.

                                           

       Today the case is fixed for consideration on the point of admissibility.

       Learned counsel for the complainant has suffered his separate statement to effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint further and withdraws the same on technical ground and sought permission to file the fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.     

              In view of the above statement the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies of the same. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:05.06.2024.                

                       President,      

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh)

   Member                   Member