Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/254/2012

Anurag Mittal - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Greenfield Sites Management Private Limited, - Opp.Party(s)

Rajeev Gupta & Sonia Gupta

28 Sep 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 254 of 2012
1. Anurag MittalC/o 2, Staff Quarters, Kirori Mal College, Delhi University, New Delhi. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. M/s Greenfield Sites Management Private Limited, (A Greenfield Ventures Group Company) SCO No. 196-197, 4th Floor, Sector 34/A, Chandigarh 160047, through its Managing Director.2. M/s Chandigarh Overseas Private Limited, SCO No. 196-197, Sector 34/A, Top Floor, Chandigarh, through its Managing Director.. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Rajeev Gupta & Sonia Gupta, Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 28 Sep 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.254 of 2012

 

 

Anurag Mittal         Vs.     M/s Greenfield Sites Management Private                                              Limited & anr.

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Rajeev Gupta, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.Kamaljit Singh Lang, Counsel for OP No.1.

OP No.2 already ex-parte.

 

Dated the 28th day of September, 2012

 

ORDER

 

            Counsel for complainant has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“The OPs have redressed the grievance of the complainant, so the complainant does not want to pursue this complaint. As per instructions of the complainant, I do not press this complaint. It be dismissed as withdrawn.”

 

             In view of the above statement of counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

         

           

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER

 

 

(H.S.WALIA)

MEMBER

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER