Haryana

Panchkula

CC/31/2022

SANJAY KHANNA. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S GLM INFRATECH PVT.LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

DEEPAN SHARMA

17 Oct 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                                     

Consumer Complaint No.

:

31 of 2022

Date of Institution

:

31.01.2022

Date of Decision

:

17.10.2023


1.       Sanjay Khanna S/o Sh. Bhola Nath Khanna

2.       Maju Khanna W/o Sh. Sanjay Khanna

          Both residents of H. No. 3603, Sector 32-D, Chandigarh.

3.       Rakesh Kumar Verma S/o Sh. Rajinder Pal

4.       Rajesh Kumar S/o Sh. Rajinder Pal

          Both residents of H. No. B-15/335, Mohalla Sui Garan, Patiala (Punjab)-   147001.

 

                                                                                      ­….Complainants

Versus

M/s GLM Infratech Pvt. Ltd. having registered office at “AMAZON – THE DEFENCE COUNTY”, Sector 30, Panchkula, through its authorized signatory Col. S.S Deswal (Retd.).

….Opposite Party

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 35 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 AS AMENDED UPTO DATE

Before:        Mr. Satpal, President.

                   Dr. Sushma Garg, Member.     

                   Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav, Member                              

 

Present:-      Sh. Deepan Sharma, Advocate, for the Complainant.     

                   OP already ex-parte vide order dated 21.03.2022.

 

                   Today the case is fixed for filing evidence by the Complainant. At this stage, the Ld. Counsel on behalf of the Complainant, by making a separate statement, states that the project in question has been handed over from OP i.e. GLM Infratech Pvt. Ltd. to GLM Buyers Welfare Association by the order of RERA, and in pursuance to such order, GLM Buyers Welfare Association has taken over the possession and is taking care of the project in question; hence, he withdraws the present complaint, seeking liberty to file it afresh before the before the appropriate authority/Tribunal/Competent Court etc. in future, in case, the grievances of the Complainant are not redressed in its entirety.   

                    Heard. In view of the statement made by the Ld. Counsel for the Complainant, the present complaint is hereby ordered to be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file it afresh before the Commission/Appropriate Authority/Tribunal/Competent Court etc., in case, the grievances of the Complainant are not redressed in its entirety through GLM Buyers Welfare Association.   

                   A copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of costs and File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

Dt.              (Dr. Barhm Parkash Yadav)       (Dr.Sushma Garg)                   (Satpal)

17.10.2023         Member                            Member                         President  

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.