West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/508/2022

Ankit Chowdhury, S/o. Aloke Kumar Chowdhury - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Dharitri Infraventure Pvt Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Jay Mitra Ray

06 Mar 2023

ORDER

Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/508/2022
( Date of Filing : 01 Sep 2022 )
 
1. Ankit Chowdhury, S/o. Aloke Kumar Chowdhury
AT/10,Sonargaon Narendrapur Station Road,P.O.-Sonarpur,P.S. Narendrapur,Dist South 24 Parganas,Kolkata-700150
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Dharitri Infraventure Pvt Ltd
DN 51,Marlin Infinite,6th Floor,Unit 606,Sec V,Salt Lake City,P.O.-Sech Bhawan,P.S.-Electronics Complex,Dist North 24 Parganas,Kolkata-700091
2. Suman Jana,S/O-Tapan Kumar Jana,Director of M/S-Dharitri Infraventure Pvt. Ltd
Rupnarayan Pally,Vill-Barbarisha,P.O & P.S.-Kolaghat,Dist -East Medinipur,Pin-721134
3. Dipanwita Samanta,W/O-Suman KumarJana,Director of M/S-Dharitri Infraventure Pvt. Ltd
Rupnarayan Pally,Vill-Barbarisha,P.O & P.S.-Kolaghat,Dist -East Medinipur,Pin-721134
4. Khadija BiBi
Chandpur,Rajarhat,P.S. Rajarhat,Dist. North 24 Parganas,Kolkata-700135,Under Chandpur Gram Panchayet
5. Panchami Naskar/Panchami Bala Naskar
Chandpur,Rajarhat,P.S. Rajarhat,Dist. North 24 Parganas,Kolkata-700135,Under Chandpur Gram Panchayet
6. Barnali Mondal
Chandpur,Rajarhat,P.S. Rajarhat,Dist. North 24 Parganas,Kolkata-700135,Under Chandpur Gram Panchayet
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 06 Mar 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case of the complainant in brief is that the complainant entered into an agreement for sale with OP-developer in 2018 for a 2BHK flat measuring 600 Sq.ft. super built up area at the “Royal Enclave” project situated at Mouza – Hudrait, under P.S. – Rajarhat, Chandrapur Gram Panchayat, District – North 24 Parganas at a total consideration amount of Rs. 18, 00,000/- out of which the complainant paid Rs. 5, 00,000/- on 22.07.2018 to the OP. But after a lapse of 4 to 5 years the complainant could not find any progressive development work in the said project for which he is requested the Ops to refund the paid amount. Thereafter, the complainant has received an amount of Rs. 20,000/- on 28.07.2020 and Rs. 30,000/- on 23.09.2020. But the remain balance amount is still lying with the OP 1 to OP 3. On several occasions, the complainant requested the aforesaid Ops to refund the balance amount but OP did not turn up. On 09.12.2021, the complainant sent his Advocate’s letter to the OPs requesting to refund an amount of Rs. 4, 50,000/- but all were in vain. Finding no other alternatives, the complainant files this case praying for direction upon the Ops to refund Rs. 4,50,000/- with interest and to pay compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 50,000/-.

  Notices were served upon the OPs on 22.10.2022. In spite of that none appears on behalf of the Ops and no written version was filed. Hence, the case was proceeded ex-parte against all the Ops vide Order No. 02 dated 06.12.2022.

Decision with reasons

To prove his case the complainant Mr.Ankit Chowdhury adduced money receipt of Rs5, 00,000/-acknowledged by the OP-developer from where it appears that he paid that amount to the OPs. The allotment letter dated 11.02.2019 issued by the OPs ensures that the complainant have been allotted a flat at the Royal Enclave project of the OPs. Further it appears from the letter dated 09.12.2021 sent by the Ld. Advocate of the complainant proves that the OPs have failed to deliver the proposed flat to the complainant and promised to refund the entire paid amount to the complainant out of which Rs 50,000/ was paid in favour of the complainant although Rs. 4, 50,000/- is still lying with the OPs. OPs are liable to refund the entire amount paid by the complainant but they failed to do the same which amounts to deficiency in service on their parts. Further considering the the mental pain and agony of the complainant, he is compensated with interest @9% p.a in the form of compensation. OPs are liable to pay litigation cost to the complainant for their in action.

In the result the petition of complaint is succeeds.

                           Hence, it is,

                                      Ordered

that the complaint case being no. CC/508/2022 is allowed ex parte against the OPs with cost. OPs are directed to refund Rs. 4, 50,000/- to the complainant within 45 days from this date of order along with interest @9%p.a. from the date of deposition of the amount till realization in the form of compensation. OPs are further directed to pay Rs. 20,000/- as litigation cost to the complainant within the aforesaid stipulated period failing which entire amount shall carry interest @12%p.a.

Let a plain copy be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR.

Dictated and Corrected by

[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Sagarika Sarkar]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.