Haryana

Panchkula

ea/34a/2019

sh.Rahul Bakshi. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S DEEPAK COMMUNICATION - Opp.Party(s)

COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.

23 Jun 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                              

Execution Application No.

:

34 of 2019

Date of Institution

:

17.09.2019

Date of Decision

:

23.06.2021

 

Rahul Bakshi S/o Late Sh. Paras Ram Bakshi, House No. 486, Himshikha Colony, Pinjore, Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula.             

                                                                        ….Decree Holder/Complainant

Versus

1.       M/s Deepak Communication, Opp. CRPF Gate No. 1, Himshikha,  Pinjore.

2.       M/s Samsung, Authorized Service Centre, SCO No. 62, 1st Floor, Swastik Vihar, MDC, Sector 5, Panchkula through its Managing Director/Authorized Representative.

3.       CPP Assistance Services Pvt. Ltd. (Bajaj Finserv Fone Safe), Ground Floor, Wing-A, Golf View Corporate Tower-A, Golf Course Road, Sector 42, Gurugram-122002, Haryana through its Managing Director/Authorized Representative.

                                                              ….Judgment Debtors/Opposite Parties

Execution Application under Section 71 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Before:         Shri Satpal, President.

Dr.Pawan Kumar Saini, Member.

                     Dr.Sushma Garg, Member.

 

Present:        Shri Lakshay Bakshi, son of DH/Complainant.

                     Ms. Jyoti Rani, Advocate for JD/OP No.2.

                     Ms. Priya Goel, Advocate for JD/OP No.3.

         

          Today the case is fixed for consideration on the statement made by DH/complainant. At this stage, Shri Lakshya Bakshi, son of the DH/Complainant appeared and made a separate statement stating therein that present execution application was filed by his father Late Shri Rahul Bakshi (DH/complainant), who expired on 07.06.2021 and placed on record death certificate of his father as Mark A and his Aadhar Card as Mark B and in view of the statement of his father made on 22.04.2021, he wants to withdraw the present execution petition being fully satisfied, as the disputed amount in question had already been received by his father.         

                     Heard. In view of the statement made by the Shri Lakshay Bakshi son of DH/Complainant, the present execution application is hereby dismissed being fully satisfied.  File be consigned to the record room, after due compliance.

                     A copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of costs.

 

Dt.                (Dr.Sushma Garg)           (Dr. Pawan Kumar Saini)               (Satpal)

23.04.2021     Member                          Member                                    President

HG

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.