Punjab

Ludhiana

CC/18/68

Mohinder Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Darshan Food - Opp.Party(s)

03 Dec 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA.

 

Consumer Complaint No. : 68 of 29.01.2018

   Date of Decision       :   03.12.2018 

 

Mohinder Singh aged about 60 years son of Sh.Gurcharan Singh r/o H.No.11704, Street No.2, S.A.S.Nagar, Ludhiana.

….. Complainant

Versus

1.M/s. Darshan Foods, Boothgarh Road, village Rattanheri, Khanna, through its Prop/Partner/M.D/Authorized Representative.

2.M/s Jimmy Confectionary, Vishvakarma Colony, Near Dholewal, Ludhiana, through its Prop.Sh.Guneet Singh.

…Opposite parties

 

          (Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

 

QUORUM:

SH.G.K.DHIR, PRESIDENT

SH.VINOD GULATI, MEMBER

 

COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES:

For complainant                      :         Sh.Balraj Singh, Advocate

For Ops                         :         Ex-parte

 

PER G.K DHIR, PRESIDENT

 

1.                          Complainant along with his family is a consumer in routine of the products manufactured by OP1 and for that purpose, he had been purchasing the products from OP2. Packet of snacks namely (Bhoj Ram Natto Lite) was purchased by the complainant from OP2 on 10.1.2018. That product manufactured by OP1 in September 2017. Before opening the packet manufactured by OP1, complainant was surprised to see that said packet was filled with air and is totally empty. That packet is produced in the Forum. On account of this negligence on the part of Ops, complainant claims to have suffered and that is why, this complaint for directing Ops to pay compensation for mental agony and harassment of Rs.1 lac.

2.              Ops are ex-parte in this case.

3.               Complainant in ex-parte evidence tendered his affidavit Ex.CA along with documents Ex.C1 and Ex.C2 and thereafter, closed the evidence.

4.                          Written arguments not submitted, but oral arguments alone addressed by counsel for complainant and those were heard. Records gone through minutely. 

5.                Product purchased by complainant from OP2 is produced as Ex.C2. The sealed envelope of this product known as “Bhoj Ram Natto Lite” (produced as Ex.C2) shows that this packet (envelop) is filled with air and no consumable item contained in it. This product manufactured in September 2017 by OP1 is a fact borne from the empty packet of the product. MRP of the product is Rs.5/-. Sale of empty packet by OP2 to complainant is an unfair trade practice because whosoever purchases an eatable packet he does so by assuming that eatable are contained in the packet.    As empty packet supplied by OP1 to OP2 was sold to complinant and as such, certainly Ops adopted unfair trade practice by selling an empty packet to the complainant. In view of this major deficiency in service on the part of Ops, complainant entitled for refund of entire price of Rs.5/- of the product along with interest @6% per annum from the date of purchase namely 10.1.2018 till payment. As empty packet handed over to complainant and as such, complainant suffered mental agony and harassment and was dragged in this litigation. So, composite amount of Rs.5000/- needs be allowed on account of compensation and litigation expenses.  

6.                Therefore, as a sequel of the above discussion, complaint allowed exparte with directions to Ops to refund the price of Rs.5/- along with interest @6% per annum thereon w.e.f. 10.01.2018 till payment. Composite amount of Rs.5000/-(Rupees Five Thousand Only) allowed on account of compensation and litigation expenses. Payment of this amount of Rs.5000/- be  made by Ops to complainant within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of order. Copies of order be supplied to the parties free of costs as per rules.

7.                File be indexed and consigned to record room.

 

 

 (Vinod Gulati)                                        (G.K.Dhir)

 Member                                                     President

Announced in Open Forum

Dated:03.12.2018

Gurpreet Sharma.

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.