View 593 Cases Against Country Vacations
View 593 Cases Against Country Vacations
K. Prakash Rao filed a consumer case on 19 Jun 2015 against M/s Country Vacations in the Visakhapatnam-II Consumer Court. The case no is CC/16/2012 and the judgment uploaded on 29 Jun 2015.
Reg. of the Complaint: 10-01-2012 Date of Order:19-06-2015
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II
AT VISAKHAPATNAM
Present:
1.Sri H.ANANDHA RAO, M.A., L.L.B.,
President
2.Sri C.V.RAO, M.A., B.L.,
Male Member
3.Smt.K.SAROJA, M.A., B.L.,
Lady Member
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015
CONSUMER CASE NO.16/2012
BETWEEN:
Sri k. Prakash Rao S/O Late Narayana Rao,
Hindu, aged 82 years, R/o C/o DB Venkata Rao,
Grand Villa Apartments, D.No.51-8-40-36,
Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam.
…Complainant
AND:
1.M/s Country Vacations ( A Division of Country Club)
Rep. by its Customer Care Manager, Regd. Office,
Amrutha Castle, 5-9-16, Saidabad, Opp.Secretariat,
Hyderabad.
2.M/s Country Vacations ( A Division of Country Club)
Rep. by its Corporate Manager, Customer Care Centre,
Opp: IDBI Bank, Near Saraswati Partk,
Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam.
3.M/s Country Vacations ( A Division of Country Club),
Rep. by its Manager, Officer, 3-6-12/12, 4th floor,
Al-Samad Building, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad.
…Opposite Parties
This case coming on 27-05-2015 for final hearing before us in the presence of SRI SYED MOINUDDIN, Advocate for the Complainant, and of SMT.SONTYANA MOHAN RAO, Advocate for the Opposite Parties, and having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following.
ORDER
(As per SMT.K.SAROJA, Honourable Lady Member on behalf of the Bench)
Exhibit A1 is the Receipt, dated 31-05-2007, Exhibit A2 is the Receipt, dated 31-05-2007, Exhibit A3 is the letter addressed by the complainant for cancellation, dated 11-04-2011, Exhibit A4 is the Letter addressed by OP informaing cancellation, dated 28-04-2010, Exhbit A5 is the Letter addressed by the complainant to OP2, dated 05-03-2011, Exhibit A6 is the Notice issued to all OPs by complainant, dated 08-08-2011 and Exhibit A7 is the letter addressed by the OP3.
6. The fact shown from Exhibit A1 and A2 reveals that the complainant had paid Rs.85,000/- towards Studio Blue as an initial payment on 31-05-2007 which was acknowledged by the OP and gave receipt in favour of the complainant. Exhibit A4 shows that the OP issued a letter to the complainant stating that his membership cancellation was approved by the OP. “The OP would like to inform you, that your request for membership cancellation is approved. So, we are also explained how there was a lot of processing for membership cancellation that is why we are delaying your request. Now your membership was cancelled and approved for refund of your amount will be refunded and as early as possible. So please cooperate with us”.
7. Exhibit A4 reveals that the complainant application was approved and his membership was cancelled by the OP. So, he is entitled for the amount which was paid by him.
8. The point that would arise for determination is:
Whether there is any deficiency of service on the part of the OPs? If so, Whether the Complainant is entitled to the reliefs asked for?
9. After careful perusal of the case record, this forum finds that the complainant was a member in the OPs club is not disputed. Though the OPs have promised the complainant vide their letter dated 28-04-2010 that they have cancelled the membership of the complainant and the amount will be refunded as early as possible but they failied to pay the said amount to the complainant, even after receiving legal notice also. Once, they have saated that they have cancelled the membership , they are estopped from the plea that according to the terms and condtions of the membership agreement, the complainant is not entitled to any reliefs; Exhibit A7 reveals that the OP has informed to their members that “we have opened the new customer care office centrally in Visakhapatnam for entire AP Members as part of enhancing the services. We also would like to inform you that local branch will not be functional on any services. For all further kind of services assistance, please contact at Visakhapatnam Branch “ which shows that the complainant has jurisdiction to file this complaint before this forum. As the complainant suffered a lot of mental agony and physical strain from 2007 to till now, but the OP failes to refund the amount which was paid by the complainant amounts to deficiency in service coupled with unfair trade practice on the part of the OPs. As the complainant forced to file this complaint before this Forum is entitled to compensation. Hence, the complainant is entitled to Rs.85,000/- with interst, some compensation and costs too.
10. In the result, this complainant is allowed, directing the Opposite Parties 1 to 3 to pay an amount of Rs.85,000/- (Rupees Eighty Five Thosuand only) with interest @ 9% p.a., from 28-04-2010 till the date of realization, a compensation of Rs.10,000/- and costs of Rs.2500/- to the complainant. Time for compliance, one month from the date of this order.
Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 19th day of June, 2015.
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
M.MEMBER PRESIDENT L.MEMBER
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
Exhibits Marked for the Complainant:
Exhibits | Date | Description | Remarks |
A-1 | 31-05-2007 | Receipt | Original |
A-2 | 31-05-2007 | Receipt | Original |
A-3 | 11-04-2010 | Letter addressed by complainant for cancellation | Office copy |
A-4 | 28-04-2010 | Letter addressed by OP informing cancellation | Original |
A-5 | 05-03-2011 | Letter addressed by complainant to OP2 | Office copy |
A-6 | 08-08-2011 | Notice issued to all OPs by complainant | Office copy |
A-7 | - | Letter of OP-3 | Office copy |
Exhibits Marked on behalf of the OPs: -nil-
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
M.MEMBER PRESIDENT L.MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.