Orissa

Rayagada

CC/57/2020

Tribendra Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Cholamandlam finance Co. Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

16 Feb 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION RAYAGADA
ODISHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/57/2020
( Date of Filing : 24 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Tribendra Singh
S/o Late Nirmal singh, Medical Colony
Rayagada
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s Cholamandlam finance Co. Ltd.,
Raipur
Chatisgarh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Satish Kumar Panigrahi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION RAYAGADA, ODISHA.

 

Date of Institution: 24.09.2020

     Date of Final Hearing: 16.02.2023

         Date of  Pronouncement: 16.02.2023

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. –57 / 2020

Tribendra  Singh, 

S/O: Late Nirmal Singh,

At: Medical Colony,

Post/Dist: Rayagada.

 

(Through Self for the Complainant)                           …Complainant

Versus

The Manager,

M/S. Cholamandalam Head office,

Raipur, Chatisgada.

 

(Through Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumandan,Advocate, for the Opposite Party)                                                                                            …Opposite Parties

 

Present:          1. Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda, President.

2. Sri Satish Kumar Panigrahi, Member.

ORDER

Sri  Rajendra  Kumar  Panda, President.

 

Brief facts of the case:-

Case in hand is the allegation of  deficiency in service and unfair trade practice by the O.Ps  for  non-delivery  of   four  wheeler bearing Regd. No.OD-18-D-5679   to the complainant which  the complainant sought  redressal.

         On being noticed the O.P appeared  and submitted that    Tribendra  Singh (Complainant)  expired  during  covid-19  which was  informed by  the wife  of the   complainant   to the  employees  of the  O.P  who were personally visited complainants  house  for  collection  of  E.M.I  in connection of debt to the vehicle vide  Regd. No. .OD-18-D-5679.  

Further notice returned back un served to the complainant  with the postal endorsement “No such person in  the addressee”.

No application has been filed by the  Legal heirs  of the complainant  for substitution of the complainant.

In these circumstances, the complaint petition stands dismissed with liberty  to file fresh case if the circumstance desired so.

However, if any application is filed by the  LRs of the complainant, the matter will be taken up again.

.Miscellaneous  order if any  delivered by this  commission  relating to this case  stands vacated. 

 A copy of this order be provided to all the parties at  free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act,  2019 or they may download same from the confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of order received from this Commission.

The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.

File be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

   (S. K. PANIGRAHI)                                                      (R. K. PANDA)

MEMBER                                                                 PRESIDENT

 

PRONOUNCED ON 16.02.2023

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.