Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/15/281

Abdulla Arshad - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s cholamandalam Investment - Opp.Party(s)

Shafi m

22 Feb 2016

ORDER

C.D.R.F. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/15/281
 
1. Abdulla Arshad
s/o Ibrahim R/at baithful suroor near leage office mogral kasaragod
Kasaragod
kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s cholamandalam Investment
Dane house ist Floor old No 234,New No 2 NSC Bose Road parys
Chennai
TamilNadu
2. M/s cholamandalam Investment
cIFICL iind floor Building No 1 1363 A7 A8 Pranavu Arcade Kanhangad
Kasaragod
kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

 

D.O.F: 30/10/15

D.o.O:23/2/2016

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                         CC.NO.281/15

                             Dated this, the 23rd    day of  February  2016

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI            : PRESIDENT

SMT.BEENA K.G               : MEMBER

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER 

 

Abdulla Arshad.I.K   S/o Ibrahim,

 R/at Baithul suroor, Near League Office,

Mogral   Po. ,  Kasaragod.                                       : Complainant

 (Adv.Shafi.M)

 

1. Cholamandalam Investment& Finance Co.Ltd,  

Dare House, Ist floor, Old No.234, New No.2,

NSC Bose Road, Parrys, Chennai, Tamilnadu represented

By its Manager.

2.Cholamandalam Investment& Finance Co.Ltd,  

CIFCL, 2nd floor, Bldg No.1,1363-A7,A8

Pranav  Arcade,Main Road,  Kanhangad.                                     :Opposite parties

Kasaragod. Dt.

 

                                                           ORDER

SMT.P.RAMADEVI    : PRESIDENT

    Opposite parties raised an issue regarding  the maintainability of the complaint before this forum in the light of the order passed by the Hon’ble National Commission  in Magna Fincorp.Ltd & others vs Praveen  Benson  & others (RP.No.1936/15) dtd. 3/11/2015.

   That the contention of the opposite party  that the complaint is barred by principles of res judicata  since  the arbitration award is  passed in respect of the same  subject matter and the complainant is not maintainable before this Forum.

  Heard both sides.  In this case an arbitration  award  is passed in respect of the same subject matter. The observation of the Hon’ble National Commission is  “ in view of the decision of the Arbitrator which is binding on parties, the forum below should not have passed an order by over looking the award”.

    On going through the above decision of the Hon’ble National Commission and on perusal of  the documents , we are of the view that the complaint is barred by principles of resjudicata and hence it is not maintainable before this Forum.  Therefore the   complaint is dismissed  .  No order as to cost.

Sd/                                                                           Sd/                                                                          Sd/

MEMBER                                                    MEMBER                                                     PRESIDENT

eva                                                            /forwarded by order/

                                                                   SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.