KALLA VENKATA PRASAD filed a consumer case on 30 May 2015 against M/S CELKON IMPEX LIMITED in the Visakhapatnam-II Consumer Court. The case no is CC/22/2013 and the judgment uploaded on 20 Jun 2015.
Andhra Pradesh
Visakhapatnam-II
CC/22/2013
KALLA VENKATA PRASAD - Complainant(s)
Versus
M/S CELKON IMPEX LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)
K. GOVIND
30 May 2015
ORDER
Reg. of the Complaint:08-02-2013
Date of Order:30-05-2015
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II
AT VISAKHAPATNAM
Present:
1.Sri H.ANANDHA RAO, M.A., L.L.B.,
President
2.Sri C.V.RAO, M.A., B.L.,
Male Member
3.Smt.K.SAROJA, M.A., B.L.,
Lady Member
SATURDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2015
CONSUMER CASE NO.22/2013
BETWEEN:
Sri Kalla Venkata Prasad S/o late Kalla Viswanadham,
Hindu, aged 45 years, r/at D.No.43-7-4/1,
Beside Srilaxmi Ganesh Temple, Railway New Colony,
Visakhapatnam.
…Complainant
AND:
1.M/s Celkon Impex Limited, rep. by its Managing Director,
This case coming on 27-05-2015 for final hearing before us in the presence of SRI G.Gopala Rao & K.Govindu, Advocates for the Complainant, and of 2nd Opposite Party being remained exparte, and having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following.
ORDER
(As per SRI C.V.RAO, the Honourable Member on behalf of the Bench)
The Complainant asked the Forum to direct the OPs, jointly and severally
For return of an amount of Rs.5,000/- together with interest @ 24 p.a., from 16-01-2012 till the date of realization or
Give new another model mobile for the same price for the same configuration;
For compensation of Rs.50,000/- towards mental agony and sufferance;
For compensation of Rs.45,000/- towards charges;
Pass such other relief or reliefs as the Honourable Forum may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
The claim against the 1st Opposite Party was dismissed as the complainant failed to take steps against the 1st OP.
The 2nd Opposite Party did not resist the claim of the complainant as it was set exparte and remained exparte.
The case of the complainant, as can be seen from the complaint, is that the complainant purchased a Mobile Phone from M/s BIG-C Mobiles Private Limited, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam for a sum of Rs.4,599/- i.e., Celkon Mobile Model No.A1, IMEI/MEID Number 911139500032218, along with charger and that the said shop also passed cash receipt Invoice No.SI/DIM/6493, dated 16-01-2012 in favour of the complainant and also issued warranty card for a period of one year and that subsequently the said mobile set giving trouble to the complainant and failed to functioning i.e., Touch Pad not working and touch also not working and immediately the complainant approached the 2nd OP and requested the 2nd OP to rectify the defects for which the 2nd OP received the said mobile phone no.9866046320 and also acknowledged the receipt and of said phone vide acknowledgement dated 14-01-2012 and the 2nd OP asked the complainant the said mobile not proper working in future and that the OP failed to attend on the said cell phone and failed to rectify the defects from time to time and thus put the complainant suffer both mentally and physically besides financially also and the complainant stated that the OP made the complainant run all these days from time to time from pillar to post and thus committed gross deficiency of service towards the complainant for which the OPs are liable to pay damages, apart from replacing the New Cell Phone or to refund the costs of the same to the complainant and all these acts are putting the complainant to immense mental agony and as such the complaint is entitled for compensation and that the complainant vexed with the attitude of the Ops, the complainant got issued a registered lawyer’s notice to the OPs 1 &2 on 21-08-2012 and the 1st OP acknowledged the said notice on 23-08-2012 and the 2nd OP duly acknowledged the said notice on 23-08-2012 and after receiving the said notice, the OPs did not give new mobile cost nor gave any reply to the complainant till date and the complainant is a Consumer and the act of the Opposite Parties are with deficiency and Hence, this complaint.
The complainant filed an affidavit to support his claim. Exhibit A1 to A6 are marked for the complainant. The matter has been heard on behalf of the Complainant.
After careful perusal of the case record, the forum finds that on 16-01-2012, the complainant purchased the mobile in question from one M/s BIG C Mobiles Private Limited, # 47-10-32, Guttikonda Mansions, Near Diamond Park, 2nd lane, Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam-16 as per Exhibit A1 Cash Bill. But very peculiarly, the complainant did not add the said M/s BIG C Mobiles Pvt. Ltd., as a party in this complaint. As such, the complaint is defective for non-joinder of a necessary party. In these circumstances, this complaint can not be looked into and it is liable to be dismissed in limini.
In the result, this Complaint is dismissed. No costs.
Dictated to the Stenographer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 30th day of May, 2015.
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
LADY MEMBER PRESIDENT M.MEMBER
APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE
Exhibits Marked for the Complainants:
Exhibits
Date
Description
Remarks
A-1
16-01-2012
Cash Bill No.SI/DIM/6493 issued by the BIG-C
Original
A-2
Guaranty Card issued by the BIG-C
Original
A-3
21-08-2012
Registered Lawyer’s Notice
Office Copy
A-4
23-08-2012
Acknowledgement from OP1
Original
A-5
23-08-2012
Acknowledgement from OP2
Original
A-6
14-01-2012
Complaint Receipt
Original
Exhibits Marked for the OPs -nil-
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
LADY MEMBER PRESIDENT M.MEMBER
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.