Delhi

StateCommission

RP/51/2019

MAMTA RAGHAV - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

RAJAN LAL

11 Jul 2019

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

Date of Arguments :11.07.2019

Date of order :17.07.2019

Revision Petition No.51/2019

In the matter of:

 

Mamta Raghav,

W/o. Shri Nain Singh,

R/o/ 10/43, Village Karkardooma,

•  

 

Versus

 

M/s. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd.,

Shakti Kiran Building,

•  

 

 

CORAM

Hon’ble Sh. O. P. Gupta, Member (Judicial)

1.     Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?                                                      Yes/No

2.      To be referred to the reporter or not?                                                                                                           Yes/No

Shri O.P. Gupta, Member (Judicial)

JUDGEMENT

1. The present revision at the stage of admission is directed against order dated 10.04.19 passed by District Forum East in CC No.263/18. Vide impugned order District Forum declined request for interim relief of restoration of disconnected meter. The District Forum observed that the petitioner/ complainant merely prayed for restraining  respondent/ OP from transferring electricity bill of CA No.100830270 in CA No.100725014 and continue to have electricity meter under old CA No.100830270. Since no prayed for restoration of electricity supply of CA No.100830270 was made by the petitioner/ complainant, no interim order directing restoration of electricity could be passed.
2. I specifically asked the counsel for the petitioner as to how a relief which has been not prayed could be granted. He submitted that the prayer made by him was wide enough to include the restoration of electricity supply. I fail to appreciate the argument. She prayed for restraining transferring of bill of one CA number in other CA number. The same can by no stretch of imagination be said to include prayer for restoration of the electricity.
3. I do not find any infirmity in the order so as to interfere in revisional jurisdiction.
4. The revision fails and is dismissed in limine.
5. Copy of the order be sent to both the parties free of cost.
6. One copy of the order be sent to District forum for information.
7. File be consigned to record room.

                                        

(O.P. GUPTA)                                                     

MEMBER (JUDICIAL)