DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
NORTH 24 Pgs., BARASAT.
M.A- 161/2017
Arising Out Of E.A- 133/2015
Date of Filing: Date of Disposal:
28.07.2017 05.11.2018
Dhr :- 1. Smt. Mousumi Santra
W/o. Sri Shyamal Santra
42/1/C,
Residing at No
Mondal Para Lane, Kolkata-700090
Presently residing at No-166,
Bidhan Park, Ground Floor
Kolkata-700090, P.S.- Baranagar
Dist- North 24 Parganas.
=Vs=
Jdr/s :- 1. M/s Binodini Construction
A proprietorship firm, having its
Office at 35/1, Atta Para Lane,
Kolkata-700050, P.S.-Baranagar
Represented by its sole proprietor
Sri Prabir Kumar Das
S/o. Lt. Banbehari Das
Residing at-35/1, Atta Para Lane
Kolkata-700050, P.S.-Baranagar,
Dist- North 24 Parganas.
2. Smt. Renu Bala Dutta Roy
W/o. Lt. Sachi Dulal Dutta Roy
3. Sri Ujjal Dutta Roy
4. Sri Utpal Dutta Roy
Nos. 3 & 4 S/o Lt. Sachi Dulal Dutta
Roy.
5. Smt. Soma Baral
6. Smt. Rupa Nayer
Nos. 5 & 6 granddaughter of
S/o Lt. Sachi Dulal Dutta Roy
Nos. 2 to 6 of 166, Bidhan Park
Kolkata-700090, P.S.-Baranagar.
P R E S E N T :- Sri. Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay………..…..President.
:- Smt. Silpi Majumder ……………………………………Member.
:- Smt. Monisha Shaw …………………………………….Member.
Cont……………………2
:2:
Order No- 15
The Dhr is present. On 28.07.2017 the Dhr filed one application which was registered as MA 161/2017. None is present on behalf of the Jdrs. We take up the said application for hearing and its disposal.
This order is arising out of the MA being no- 161/2017 filed by the Dhr in the EA- 133/2015 praying for certain amendment in the Deed of Conveyance.
In the application it is stated by the Dhr that due to inadvertence in the Deed of Conveyance Daag Number, description of land, Khatian Number, Mouja, JL Number, RS Number have not been mentioned.
According to the Dhr such mentioned is not his malafide latches, rather due to such bonafide latches the Dhr has prayed for incorporation of the abovementioned in the Deed of Conveyance, which has not yet been executed.
It is stated by the Dhr that if this application is not allowed the interest will be seriously prejudiced and prayer is made by the Dhr for allowing the application.
Upon considering the content of application in our view that the amendment as sought for by the Dhr is formal in nature which are not change the nature and character of the Deed of Conveyance as well as the averment of the present EA.
It is also seen by us that if this application is not allowed the Dhr will face serious complications in future.
In our opinion the prayer as made by the Dhr should be allowed, hence it is ordered that the MA 161/2017 is hereby allowed without any cost.
Let plain copy of this order be given to the parties free of cost as per the provision of the CPR, 2005.
Member Member President
Dictated & Corrected by