Orissa

Rayagada

CC/172/2017

Ritesh Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Binod Auto Mobiles - Opp.Party(s)

Self

05 Dec 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No.172 / 2017.                                            Date.    4    .     1  . 2019

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,                       President.

Sri  GadadharaSahu,                                             Member.

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra,                                     Member.

 

Ritesh Kumar, S/O: Sri Deepak Kumar,  C/O:Geeta Stores, Main Road, Infront of Civil Court, Po/Dist:Rayagada,  765 025  (Odisha)                        …. Complainant.

Versus.

1.The     Manager, M/S. Binod Auto  Mobiles, Bolangir, Po/Dist; Bolangiri.

2. The Manager,  M/S. Hyundai Motor’s India Ltd.,  At:  Sipcot Industrial  park, Irrungattukottal, Sriperubudur Taluk, Kanchipuram, Dist: Tamilnadu, Pin No. 602117.         .…..Opp.Parties

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Sri Sahadev  Choudhury, Advocate.

For the O.P No.1:- Set exparte.

For the O.P. No.2:- Sri N.N.Panda, Advocate, Rayagada(Odisha).

JUDGEMENT

The  curx of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  non delivery of Servicing Coupon book towards purchase  of Car LMV 120 Active VTVTS bearing Regd. No.OD-18C 6579  for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

Upon  Notice, the O.P No.1 neither entering in to appear before the forum nor filed their  written version inspite of more than  11 adjournments has been given  to them. Complainant consequently filed his memo and prayer to set exparte of the O.P No.1.  Observing lapses of around 1(one) year  for which the objectives  of the legislature of the C.P. Act going to be destroyed to the prejudice of the interest of the complainant.  Hence after hearing  the  counsel for the complainant set the case  exparte against the O.P No.1. The action of the O.P No.1 is against the principles of  natural justice as envisaged  under section  13(2) (b)(ii) of the Act. Hence the O.Ps. set exparte  as the statutory period  for filing of  written version was over to close the case with in the time frame permitted by the C.P. Act.

Upon  Notice, the O.Ps No.2  put in their appearance and filed written version  through their learned counsel in which  they refuting allegation made against them and defend the case.  The O.P No.2  taking one and another pleas and  sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act, 1986. The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated  as denial of the O.P  No. 2 . Hence the O.P No.  2   prays the forum to dismiss the case against  them  to meet the ends of justice.

Heard arguments from the learned counsel for the    O.P  No. 2  and from the   complainant.    Perused the record, documents, written version  filed by the parties. 

This forum  examined the entire material on record  and given  a thoughtful consideration  to the  arguments  advanced  before us by  the  parties touching the points both on the facts  as well as on  law.

                                               

 

                                                                FINDINGS.

From the records it reveals that, there is no dispute that the  complainant had purchased  a Car LMV 120 Active VTVTS  from the O.Ps bearing retail invoice No. H-201600270 DT. 15.2.2017. While  delivery of the above Car  the O.P. No.1 was assured  that he will  send the owners manual and service coupon  booklet by  post, but the O.Ps did not send the  service booklet about  10 months  lapsed.

Further this forum observed  prior to filing   of complaint, the complainant had issued letter to the O.Ps  on Dt. 16.05.2017 and it was duly served on the O.Ps.(Copies of the letter DT.16.5.2017  is in the file which is marked as Annexure-1 )   but they failed to furnish reply to the said letter. Hence it appears that the O.P. has been negligent and callous regarding the complaint of the complainant. So the complainant filed this C.C. case before the forum.

The O.P No.2  in their written version   taking one and another pleas and relied citations of the apex court  to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act, 1986.  Further the O.P. No. 2  in their written  version  para-13  clearly  mentioned  the complainant has already received the booklet and manual on Dt. 19.2.2018. The dealer has  previously sent the booklet and manual to the complainant.  Additionally, the complainant has issued a satisfaction note pursuant to delivery of the booklet/manual with assurance to not go legal  against the O.Ps, which  is in the file   marked as Annexure-2.

            The O.Ps  considering the exigencies   of  the matter with out any basis   in the right time properly settled the disputes  at his end to avoid further litigation by  over looking  all the deficiencies  without contesting the present case  in the sense of humanitarian point of view  by following  the principles of  natural  justice in view of justice as contemplated  the  Modos  Operandi  of the O.Ps   no doubt  worthy of credence.

            We perused the documents   filed by the complainant  as well as the O.Ps in our considered view   there is nothing  to disbelieve  the contents of the O.Ps regarding  their service  to  the satisfaction of the complainant  and forum do not find any reason  to hold the O.Ps.

            Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  and  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after receipt  of servicing  coupon book. Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me

Pronounced on this       4 th.         Day of       January,   2019.

           

             

            Member.                                          Member.                           President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.