Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/26/2013

K.V.NITHIN DEV - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/S BHARATI AIRTEL LTD - Opp.Party(s)

16 Jul 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/26/2013
 
1. K.V.NITHIN DEV
D-3,MAGNUM APARTMENTS CHAKKORATHKULAM-673006
KOZHIKODE
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/S BHARATI AIRTEL LTD
4TH FLOOR,SIMAX TOWER,WEST NADAKAVU,CALICUT-673011
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., PRESIDENT
 HONOURABLE MR. L Jyothikumar, LLB., Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KOZHIKODE.
C.C.26/2013
Dated this the 16th day of July 2013.
 
            ( Present: Sri. G. Yadunadhan, B.A., LLB.                         : President)                      
                             Sri. L. Jyothikumar, B.A., LLB.                            : Member
 
ORDER
By G. Yadunadhan, President:
 
            The petition was filed on 21-01-2013. The case of the complainant is that he had taken an Air Tel HD digital DTH TV connection ( Consumer ID 3011123017 ) on 11-10-2012 from Dotnet Solutions who is a retailer of the opposite party. The complainant took up Airtel digital HD connection as the opposite party had given an offer of 15 HD channels in which ESPN HD & Star Cricket HD were a part of that offer. As per the request of the opposite party the complainant had paid a 6 months payment in advance. On December 20th the complainant received an SMS from the opposite party saying that ESPN & Star Cricket is not available anymore and refunded Rs.100/- to his account. The complainant is not aware why and for what reason Rs.100/- was deposited in his account. On December 24th on wards opposite party removed two H.D. channels. The surprise thing is opposite party added two new channels. But he had no access to the same. These are not added in complainant’s package. Due to the deficiency of service from the opposite party complainant caused huge loss and mental agony. Therefore complainant is seeking relief against opposite party to direct them to pay a compensation of Rs.25000/-.
 
            After sending notice to opposite party it was returned with endorsement addressee left. Complainant continuously absent for the last 3 consecutive postings. On perusal of complaint it shows that some of the channels are not access with the HD DTH digital new channels added but it was not access with the digital. Only the receipt is produced, that was not improve the complainant’s case. So in the absence of any other evidence no merit in this complaint. Therefore complaint is liable to be dismissed.
 
Pronounced in the open court this the 16th day of July 2013.
Date of filing:21.01.2013.
 
                        SD/-PRESIDENT                                           SD/-MEMBER
//True copy//
(Forwarded/By Order)
 
 
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT
 
 
 
 
 
[HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONOURABLE MR. L Jyothikumar, LLB.,]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.