Haryana

Karnal

CC/194/2015

B.D. Dhawan S/o Payre Lal - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s Bharat Electronics & Communication - Opp.Party(s)

Mukul Sharma

26 Feb 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.  

                                                          Complaint No.194 of 2015

                                                               Date of instt.: 27.08.2015

                                                          Date of decision: 26.02.2016

B.D.Dhawan son of Pyare Lal c/o S.K.Engineering Kaithal Road, Karnal.

.                                                                   ……..Complainant.

                                      Vs.

1.M/s Bharat Electronics & Communication, Authorized service centre Micromax Mobile, situated at Mela Ram School, Market Shop no. Karnal through its owner/proprietor.

2.Micromax Mobile, situated at plot No.637, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon through its Managing Director.                                                                                

                                                                         ………… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer

                     Protection Act.

Before          Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:-        Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh.Ashwani Popli Advocate for the Opposite Parties.

ORDER:                  

                        The learned counsel for the Opposite Parties made statement that the Opposite parties are ready to  pay Rs.7500/- after deducting depreciation out of the  cost of the mobile phone which was Rs.11000/- subject to deposit of old mobile phone  alongwith accessories with the Opposite Parties. Thereafter, the learned counsel for the complainant made statement for withdrawal of the complaint by submitting that the complainant has returned the old mobile phone alongwith accessories to the Opposite Parties before this Forum and he does not want to pursue with the present complaint. Statements of both the parties have been recorded separately.

2.                 In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the Opposite Parties shall be bound by their statement. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:26.02.2016

                                                                    (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                   President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

            (Anil Sharma ) 

               Member.