This complaint is filed by the complainant against the opposite party for return of the original vehicle documents without mentioning what are the original documents he is asking for and also for awarding damages of Rs.5,000/-. The opposite party has appeared through an advocate and filed a statement with No Objection Certificate and counsel submitted that the R.C. book of the complainant is not with them and they are not in the custody and they are required to issue NOC and it has been issued accordingly.<br /> <br /> The counsel representing the complainant though submitted that R.C. book is with the opposite party, but he ahs not produced any documents in proof of it and even in the legal notice he got issued to the opposite party he never mentioned about R.C. book specifically. However, the counsel representing the opposite party submitted that the R.C. book was within the dealer of the vehicle, however they have been able to get it and now they are ready to hand it over to the complainant. This statement of the counsel for the opposite party is not controverted by the counsel for the complainant. The complainant as we have already pointed out has not specified original documents he is seeking and we further find because of this lapse on the part of the complainant, the opposite party was not able to meet the request of the complainant. As such, we do not find any gross deficiency in service of the opposite party. The complainant is not asking for any other documents except R.C. and NOC. Both the documents are handed over to the counsel for the complainant. Under these circumstances, we dispose of this complaint accordingly and direct both parties to bear their own costs. <br />