District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ,Faridabad.

Consumer Complaint  No. 618/2022.

 Date of Institution:15.11.2022.

Date of Order:13.03.2023.

Saurabh Tayal  W/o late Shri Hari Shankar Tayal R/o D-644, Behind Gurudwara, Chawla Colony, Ballabgarh, Faridabad.

                                                                   …….Complainant……..

                                                Versus

1.                M/s. Bajaj Allianz House Registered office: Airport road, Yerawada, Pune – 411006 registered office.

2.                M/s. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance  through its Manager  address: SCO-102/103, Shop No.3, Dwarka Complex, Sector-16, Near ICICI Bank Faridabad – 121001.

3.                Anuj Tayal, Agent of M/s. Bajaj Allianz Tayal Brother Shop No. 3A, New Anaj Mandi, Palwal.

                                                                              …Opposite parties.

Complaint under section-12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Now  amended  Section 34 of Consumer protection Act 2019.

BEFORE:            Amit Arora……………..President

Mukesh Sharma…………Member.

Indira Bhadana………….Member.

PRESENT:                   Sh.   G.N.Singh,  counsel for the complainant.

                             Sh. R.K.Sahota, counsel for opposite parties .

ORDER:  

                   Today the case was fixed for filing reply on behalf of opposite parties.

                   Instead of filing reply on behalf of opposite parties, Shri R.K.Gupta, counsel for the opposite parties has made a statement that “In the present case, company is ready to re-issue the medi-claim policy with continuity benefits, unaffected from any lapse, subject to deposit of the premium by the complainant, which was refunded by the company on dated 09.02.2023 and is also ready to possess the claim of Yash Tayal, subject to submission of original medical treatment record with the insurance company.”

                   On the other hand, Shri G.N.Singh, counsel for the complainant has made a statement that “I agree with the statement of  counsel for opposite parties.

3.                          On the  basis of the statement of both the parties,  the Commission is of the opinion that  the complaint is  disposed off with the direction to opposite parties to re-issue the medi-claim policy with continuity benefits, unaffected from any lapse, subject to deposit of the premium by the complainant, which was refunded by the company on dated 09.02.2023.  Opposite parties are also directed to process the claim of Yash Tayal, subject to submission of original

medical treatment record with the insurance company.    There are no order as to costs. Compliance of this order be made within 30 days from the date of this order.  Copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs. File be consigned to the record room.

Announced on: 13.03.2023                                         (Amit Arora)

                                                                                          President

                      District Consumer Disputes

           Redressal  Commission, Faridabad.

                                                              (Mukesh Sharma)

                Member

          District Consumer Disputes

                                                                              Redressal Commission, Faridabad.

                                                             (Indira Bhadana)

                Member

          District Consumer Disputes

                                                                                 Redressal Commission, Faridabad.